35 points Anon84 3 hours ago 5 comments
vatsachak 2 hours ago | parent
johnnylambada 1 hour ago | parent
brainless 42 minutes ago | parent
The world of tiny LLMs is so interesting. It is unlocking novel ways to encode information. Why focus on the style of writing instead of the subject matter?
SubiculumCode 33 minutes ago | parent
brainless 34 minutes ago | parent
LLMs are interesting in their own ways but as an engineer, this is a way to unlock a new way of building software.
I recently build a Claude-assisted Excel/CSV parser for a US based property management system (tax compliance). Uses Haiku and has a lot of deterministic code to extract column/row combinations to check known formats and finally handing out the headers to Haiku to give us a translation plan to our support columns.
These would eventually become part of the software, in a tiny LLM. The gap between training (such tiny LLMs) and inference will shrink. We can consult Claude for edge cases, create sample dataset and train a the tiny LLM on demand so we go to Claude less.
The tooling that a project needs is really important. Something I have been feeling as well. Not just in LLM building projects, but regular software projects that are LLM generated.