YHK - yet another hacker news clone

Who Dung It? (Turdle.fun)

11 points nb_quant 2 hours ago 13 comments

glenstein 2 hours ago | parent

Once again, hot off of AnyHumanEver, I want to say a positive thing for vibe coding because I think it inspires interesting pet projects and lowers the threshold of achievability for them. At its best it gets out of the way and you simply get to simply experience something that was another person's creative vision.

I mean this one makes me want to hold my nose, but it's also the friction of idiosyncracy that I want to see in real people being creative.

patent_man 51 minutes ago | parent

Agreed! It was fun to make, even as someone with little-to-no website creating experience.

totetsu 1 hour ago | parent

I give todays Turdle 1 for difficulty.

ynac 1 hour ago | parent

Looked like a two to me.

zikduruqe 1 hour ago | parent

I failed. I guess I don't know sh*t.

bariumbitmap 37 minutes ago | parent

This is the internet, you can say shit.

zikduruqe 10 minutes ago | parent

This was my first time cussing on HN. I'll know next time to let the words flow freely.

bariumbitmap 57 minutes ago | parent

The data quality for this game is very poor. (One might say even say it's shitty.)

I guessed wolf, game says it's bigger. I guessed cougar, game says its bigger again. I eventually struck out, turns out the animal was a sheep. I'm pretty sure wolves and cougars are bigger than sheep.

Worse yet, that's not sheep dung! Sheep dung is lots of individual round pellets, this was a single turd.

I can't believe I'm complaining about inaccurate poop data on a silly quiz site, but here we are.

Edit: here's the Wikimedia link for the curious:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Feces_of_a_sheep.JPG

I'm still suspicious, this is very unusual for a sheep.

patent_man 51 minutes ago | parent

Feedback is appreciated, thank you! The image is definitely labeled as sheep dung on Wikimedia Commons, but I will check the order of the listings for animal sizes.

Edit: I changed today's picture for a more typical example, and also ran through the list to check the sizes of the animals.

bariumbitmap 41 minutes ago | parent

Thanks for looking into this.

You really shouldn't take the descriptions on Wikimedia Commons at face value, those are uploaded by volunteers and sometimes people label things inaccurately.

patent_man 24 minutes ago | parent

Sadly I am a trusting man. But I shall verify from now on!

xnx 23 minutes ago | parent

Agree. Google image consensus is very different: https://www.google.com/search?udm=2&q=sheep+dung

gumby 24 minutes ago | parent

It’s turdles all the way down.