21 points phantomathkg 1 hour ago 34 comments

user2722 55 minutes ago | parent

Don't forget privacy policy.

Norton is owned by Avast owner which sold data for ads.

lucideer 49 minutes ago | parent

We've come a long way if people are being warned off Norton on account of its association with Avast.

(in my day we were warning people off Avast on account of its similarities to Norton)

vavkamil 31 minutes ago | parent

The parent company is Gen Digital now, and its product line is: Norton / Avast / AVG / Avira / CCleaner

I have no idea why anyone would install and use their browser.

9dev 24 minutes ago | parent

I moved out of the windows world a long time ago. Are virus scanners still a thing? Like, not just a revenue stream, but something you really should run?

yonatan8070 4 minutes ago | parent

I don't think anybody actually installs them on purpose. A lot of systems come with McAfee (Lenovo) or others pre-installed.

Interesting point, I've even has a Lenovo Legion and some ThinkBooks install McAfee autonomously after I installed Windows 11 Pro.

In enterprise environments it's a different story, McAfee and the like have similarly named products for the enterprise which actually do useful things for corporate security (like blocking unauthorized USB devices, blocking unauthorized software, reporting incidents to a central SOC system, etc.)

seabombs 46 minutes ago | parent

AVAST VIRUS DATABASE HAS BEEN UPDATED.

Blasting out my PC speakers at 2am...

miohtama 55 minutes ago | parent

Would you trust this company?

Symantec / Norton:

• Longstanding consumer complaints about aggressive upselling, scare-style scan warnings, auto-renewal, and hard-to-cancel billing

• Product often came preinstalled on PCs; many users treated it as unwanted bloatware

• Mixed reputation: lab detection scores often decent; customer-service and billing scores often poor

• 2011–2016 class action (Symantec and Digital River): alleged hidden “download insurance” / extended download service added at checkout; settled for about $60 million

• Canadian class action over alleged defects in an older Norton “decomposer” component (software sold roughly 2010–2016); later settled for tens of millions

• 2013–2022 Columbia University patent case: jury found willful infringement of malware-related patents and awarded $185 million; case later settled

• False Claims Act / GSA contracting: Symantec accused of hiding extra commercial discounts from the U.S. government; 2023 trial findings plus a 2024 Gen Digital payment of $55.1 million to satisfy the judgment LifeLock (bought by Symantec in 2016; later NortonLifeLock / Gen Digital)

• 2010 FTC settlement: about $12 million for deceptive identity-theft advertising

• 2015 FTC action: about $100 million after LifeLock violated the 2010 order (weak security program and more false claims)

• Recurring criticism that protection/reimbursement marketing overstated what the service actually did

• 2022–2023 credential-stuffing attacks on Norton Password Manager / LifeLock logins using reused passwords from other breaches; company said its own systems were not hacked; thousands of accounts had some personal data accessed and hundreds of thousands of logins were targeted

NortonLifeLock / Gen Digital

• 2021–2022 Norton Crypto: Ethereum miner bundled with Norton 360; company said it was opt-in and took a cut; users and researchers criticized it as inappropriate in a security product; later dropped

• Ongoing complaints about subscription renewals, refunds, and support after the Symantec → NortonLifeLock → Gen Digital rebrands

• Privacy/tracking investigations (alleged sharing of site/app data with third-party analytics such as Quantum Metric); not a final court finding

• Separate consumer suits alleging LifeLock failed to alert users or honor “dollar-for-dollar” identity-theft reimbursement promises

ryan-c 36 minutes ago | parent

This was dead. Not sure why, but vouched, it's relevant.

7734128 54 minutes ago | parent

If they were not using actual Norton trademarks I would have thought this was a parody.

Why would anyone use Norton? It's just malware.

bbarn 52 minutes ago | parent

It's definitely one of the saddest stories in our industry. Peter Norton's books literally taught me to program as a teenager, and now his name is synonymous with mal/bloatware.

corgi192 35 minutes ago | parent

it's also John McAfee innit

girvo 9 minutes ago | parent

I associate him more with MDPV-derived psychosis, personally.

embedding-shape 28 minutes ago | parent

It is sad to again and again be reminded that even the ones we see as heroes earlier in our lives, could do something to kind of "tarnish" our idea of them. I think lately I've gotten better at handling coming across this, as I'm getting better at realizing we're all just humans, and what we see from these public people is often just a small selected slice, we're all flawed in our ways, but we typically don't get to see those unless it's something extreme, one way or another.

Many cases of this happening too, people loved and celebrated for years/decades, then does something that just absolutely tarnishes everything they would have been remembered for. Philippe Pétain comes to mind as an extreme example, one of France's greatest national heroes up until late in his life, he became head of the Vichy regime and collaborated closely with Nazi Germany.

thenewnewguy 15 minutes ago | parent

Comparing Norton selling their company (even to a scummy owner like Symantec) to Pétain collaborating with Nazi Germany feels a bit ... extreme ... to me.

embedding-shape 50 minutes ago | parent

I'm similarly lost here.

If this is Norton, why wouldn't they be aware of how people see the very name "Norton", and avoid slapping it on any new products?

If this is NOT Norton, same applies, why would you include a term that almost causes gag-reflexes among large parts of your supposed audience?

msm_ 14 minutes ago | parent

Maybe they actually do know their audience, and HN crowd is just... not that audience? I am pretty sure most people have no idea what's wrong with Norton, and the name just sounds vaguely like cybersecurity.

sparkling 46 minutes ago | parent

100%. Anything with the name "Norton" is burned for me. This goes back to uninstallable Software around Windows XP era.

suck-my-spez 52 minutes ago | parent

Quite a lot in their privacy policy for a “private” browser

d3Xt3r 51 minutes ago | parent

Of all the new things in 2026, I wasn't expecting friking Norton coming out with a web browser. Too bad that it's yet another Chromium skin, with integrated AI that no one asked for.

Not that I expected any better from Norton tbh, but it's a shame to see a beloved brand from my childhood days fall so far from grace. Norton Utilities for DOS/Win9x used to be the bomb... NCD, NDD, SPEEDISK etc. My last good memory of it was introducing me to Darude Sandstorm. But now... sigh.

andrewstuart 42 minutes ago | parent

So this is from Symantec?

utopiah 40 minutes ago | parent

Chromium based, not open source.

m00dy 36 minutes ago | parent

yeah, I think I can vibecode it under a week.

sajithdilshan 32 minutes ago | parent

So everyone is upvoting this post to shit on Norton?

herrherrmann 26 minutes ago | parent

I guess it’s good to warn about bad actors early and throughly!

wiether 32 minutes ago | parent

I know that the current state of affairs with the AI labs bros can make the old antivirus villains look like lambs; still, I don't see how anyone would like to have anything to do with those guys.

maximevince 32 minutes ago | parent

The only good Norton is Norton Commander!

rzzzt 21 minutes ago | parent

Were the motorbikes bad?

eknkc 26 minutes ago | parent

I wouldn’t use an immortality serum if it came with Norton branding. How come it is still a thing?

sreekanth850 20 minutes ago | parent

i don't need all this shit, can i have a modern browser that run in 10 mb ram and doesnt multiply the memory with tabs. something like kmelon but works on all sites.

hollowturtle 19 minutes ago | parent

Hard to find a site this less interesting, for a product this less interesting from a company that i would never trust

fortyseven 14 minutes ago | parent

Given the reputation, who the hell is the audience for this crap?

yonatan8070 1 minute ago | parent

People who have Norton pre-installed to install it for them, probably.

I wonder what Microslop would think if a pre-installed antivirus decided to set this browser as the default over Edge.

lthi747 13 minutes ago | parent

The only useful norton software was the Norton Ghost

cheschire 12 minutes ago | parent

Doesn’t Brave offer most of those features?