76 points mcone 2 hours ago 111 comments
anovikov 2 hours ago | parent
Yes US produces mostly light crude and production of refined products requires also inputs of heavy one, but it's not produced in the Middle East anyway, so current situation can't impact that, either.
soperj 2 hours ago | parent
Aspos 1 hour ago | parent
361994752 1 hour ago | parent
daedrdev 1 hour ago | parent
larkost 1 hour ago | parent
I am not confident that the Democrats would even implement such a ban, as they get pretty big campaign donations from the oil industry as well.
soperj 23 minutes ago | parent
Retric 2 hours ago | parent
Boxxed 1 hour ago | parent
Clearly you haven't been paying attention to oil and gas prices
ncallaway 1 hour ago | parent
It's a global commodity. The reason there likely won't be a shortage in the U.S. has little to do with our production volumes, and has more to do with the fact that we're rich enough to be able to afford the higher prices when many other countries will have to forgeo using oil.
But if we weren't a rich country and we couldn't afford to pay a higher price for oil than many other nations on earth, we would produce and export oil to people that can pay more.
Ireland during the famine produced enough food to feed every person. But much of it was exported to other places, that could afford to pay a higher dollar amount to survive.
oblio 1 hour ago | parent
The US is also sovereign and if things would become really bad the government would just ban exports.
Ireland wasn't sovereign and it turns out, as much as other countries act brotherly (not that the UK really did), nobody really cares about you like you care.
WarmWash 54 minutes ago | parent
Tariffs are mostly just politics and pretty heavily partisan. Banning oil exports would be objectively evil.
AgentOrange1234 49 minutes ago | parent
orwin 31 minutes ago | parent
WarmWash 7 minutes ago | parent
downrightmike 33 minutes ago | parent
oblio 4 minutes ago | parent
laweijfmvo 1 hour ago | parent
AnimalMuppet 1 hour ago | parent
That's the best case. Worst case (for Venezuelan oil) is that the Republicans lose the House and Senate in November, then the new Congress starts investigating the Venezuela deal, and court cases start flying, and oil companies back out, and the date for the impact of the deal becomes "never".
orwin 19 minutes ago | parent
Venezuela oil also need a lot of refinement in any case, and this is where the US made a mistake, because they could just have insisted on refining Venezualan oil rather than directly taking a cut, which will be seen worse by the locals. Basically help more venezualan crude oil to get out of the field than their refinment capacity can afford, and loan them tankers to sell the crude to US refineries. US corpos could have profited a lot more (and if the US could tax them, the US government could have taken a cut) than this weird, dumb and aggressive position of taking a cut.
jcranmer 16 minutes ago | parent
There's also the fact that Venezuelan crude oil is basically among the worst grades of crude oil, the sort of stuff that the refineries don't want to use unless they have no other options. Which also means that as global oil demand hits its maximum (likely within decades), this is also going to be some of the first oil production to be permanently mothballed. With massive necessary investment to get anything running, subpar product, and a very uncertain political situation for the necessary long-term investment, most oil companies are reluctant to invest.
As a result, the only major oil company to have really been contemplating investing in Venezuela is Chevron (which itself appears to be mostly hedging its bets); Trump more recently announced another deal with a supposed major investment in an unnamed operator to extract oil from Venezuela, but without any companies being named, I'm skeptical of how real it is as opposed to merely being a vehicle for graft.
As AnimalMuppet says, if anything does get built, it's on the order of years before anything starts flowing.
buildsjets 1 hour ago | parent
https://www.newsweek.com/costco-starts-rationing-motor-oil-w...
instagib 1 hour ago | parent
Costco is the only one rationing right now.
sssilver 1 hour ago | parent
pipodeclown 1 hour ago | parent
beloch 1 hour ago | parent
Also, the U.S. is currently prosecuting a trade war against Canada that has, thanks to Trump, become a question of sovereignty for Canadians. The U.S.'s largest source of foreign oil is, potentially, one outburst from Trump away from Canada placing export duties on oil. It has been discussed in Canada, and it's viewed as an extreme option, but an option nonetheless. Trump would have to say or do something truly outrageous for that to happen, but his ability to turn allies into enemies should not be underestimated.
Bottom line, fuel could become a lot more expensive, quickly. Even if there's still gasoline to be had, it still qualifies as a shortage if it becomes unaffordable. Fuel prices affect food production, delivery of goods to markets, and pretty much every aspect of the economy.
Oil tankers travel at about the speed of a bicyle. If a price shock does happen it will last for months. If the war with Iran is not resolved promptly, this is precisely what will happen.
formerly_proven 2 hours ago | parent
manofmanysmiles 1 hour ago | parent
positr0n 1 hour ago | parent
seanmcdirmid 1 hour ago | parent
kasey_junk 47 minutes ago | parent
That’s not to say they haven’t done a phenomenal job with demand destruction it’s just their own domestic usage is still very high and they have to import unlike other heavy users.
bryanlarsen 31 minutes ago | parent
Retric 1 hour ago | parent
Many uses for oil are based on existing infrastructure, build different infrastructure and demand falls.
daedrdev 1 hour ago | parent
Projectiboga 1 hour ago | parent
downrightmike 57 minutes ago | parent
formerly_proven 50 minutes ago | parent
danans 1 hour ago | parent
snarfy 43 minutes ago | parent
floro 10 minutes ago | parent
But the storage is too limited. The surplus during the summer doesn't translate to the winter months so other types of electricity generation is still required.
bix6 1 hour ago | parent
karmakurtisaani 1 hour ago | parent
bix6 1 hour ago | parent
Rohansi 1 hour ago | parent
bix6 1 hour ago | parent
dalyons 1 hour ago | parent
medler 1 hour ago | parent
iammiles 1 hour ago | parent
I can slide in an 8’ board no problem when I’m too lazy to use the roof rack.
I haven’t upgraded the wheels or tires yet but the stock ones have had no problem going up and down the old logging and forest service roads of NW Oregon and SW Washington.
bix6 1 hour ago | parent
WarmWash 1 hour ago | parent
NegativeLatency 48 minutes ago | parent
Aspos 1 hour ago | parent
foobiekr 13 minutes ago | parent
Most people have a relatively short commute where the modest range of PHEV still allows them to mostly be on electric.
Fordec 1 hour ago | parent
bix6 1 hour ago | parent
bluGill 1 hour ago | parent
lordgilman 1 hour ago | parent
perks_12 1 hour ago | parent
kabes 1 hour ago | parent
Ajedi32 1 hour ago | parent
larkost 1 hour ago | parent
Oddly, since the Iranians (and Russians) have been selling their oil products at a discount, they were actually having the effect of holding down the price of petroleum prior to the war. No idea about how much in real terms, but...
bluGill 1 hour ago | parent
toyg 1 hour ago | parent
The longer this stupid war continues, the worse off everyone will get (well, except oil executives and shareholders, I guess).
toasty228 39 minutes ago | parent
They should be sued by governments, they can only make more money if they artificially increase their margin, if they simply passed the cost down to the consumers they shouldn't have record profits
toyg 16 minutes ago | parent
XorNot 1 hour ago | parent
The Russians are losing refineries, not oil fields.
The Russian crude trade to countries like India pushes the price down globally, but limits Russian access to refined fuels and products.
It also limits their ability to fund the war.
bryanlarsen 1 hour ago | parent
pbkompasz 57 minutes ago | parent
bryanlarsen 50 minutes ago | parent
toasty228 37 minutes ago | parent
lstodd 1 hour ago | parent
bix6 1 hour ago | parent
Ajedi32 1 hour ago | parent
WarmWash 1 hour ago | parent
No, I did not, so I did not.
I don't think we are going cold turkey, but Trump probably couldn't have given the green movement a better gift.
nostrademons 34 minutes ago | parent
Donald Trump's slogans were "Make America Great Again" and "Drill baby drill", and so of course he's been destroying America and kickstarting the green revolution through high oil prices.
nostrademons 57 minutes ago | parent
NegativeLatency 1 hour ago | parent
bix6 1 hour ago | parent
downrightmike 58 minutes ago | parent
hdgvhicv 19 minutes ago | parent
bluGill 1 hour ago | parent
Trump supporters will tell you not to worry as he has a deal that almost done and oil will once again be cheap soon. (I didn't look up what he is saying, but he typically says things like that).
There are a number of pessimists that will tell you that things will never get better. Or maybe they get better for a short time but peak oil is here and things will get worse again soon.
My guess: Iran has every incentive to keep oil prices high in the US until after the election in November as the Democrats are yelling that much of high gas prices are caused by Trump attacking Iran; the higher fuel prices are the more likely it is Trump supporters in Congress lose their reelection bid and in turn hurt Trump. However I can't predict what happens after this - there are a lot of different force in the world (Both Iran and other countries) that are hurting and nobody know who will "blink" or "do something"; much less what what actions will be taken as a result.
If you can charge at home then trading in for an EV makes sense. Electric at home is vastly cheaper than fuel. If you can't charge at home, electric prices are all over, generally cheaper, but often not by enough to be worth the bother.
Better yet, demand your town put in good public transit. Good transit is expensive in the short run, but a good network means almost everybody in the city sells one car (most people live in a family situation with multiple cars so selling leaves one for whatever their objection is).
rootusrootus 1 hour ago | parent
Ajedi32 1 hour ago | parent
The much more noticeable factor will be reducing how many people even care about gas prices in the first place.
hn_acc1 42 minutes ago | parent
Sadly, in CA, charging at home (minimum $0.26/kWh) isn't that much cheaper. Sure, maybe half the price of fueling up an efficient gas car, but not like 5x cheaper or anything..
foo12bar 1 hour ago | parent
The Bab el-Mandeb Strait, which is an alternative route used by the Saudis, is being closed by the Houthis. The Houthis are a close partner of Iran.
And the East-West pipeline, which was another alternative route owned by the Saudis, was blown up. They went for the pumping stations, so repairing it will take at least a month, and there is no way to repair it without it possibly being hit again anyway.
The oil infrastructure attacks by Ukraine are mainly targeting refineries, which would normally lower oil prices, since crude oil is an input to these refineries. These attacks are increasing diesel prices, though.
Iran is trying to break the world economy so the US packs up and leaves. Israel wants to keep the US there because the US is fighting one of their strongest enemies. Because Israel "is the US's greatest ally" (as many politicians have proclaimed over the years), they have a lot of sway as to what the US does. Not to mention, they seem to do whatever they can to derail any peace process.
Iran knows this, and therefore wants to make sure the US experiences enough pain to never come back and try to fight them again.
So, until the US is willing to stop, which rests heavily on when Israel is willing to stop, oil prices will remain high. (Or Iran folds, which they aren't going to do, they've been preparing for years and have seen how the US treated Venezuela - they stole all their oil, and left the regime intact)
Also, we've seen nothing yet, as the soft storage (the amount of oil that's normally floating through rhe global network) and the SPR's are all running dry. I would guess $150 oil in about a month.
CoastalCoder 58 minutes ago | parent
Modified3019 37 minutes ago | parent
There is now very strong incentive to develop alternatives that bypass what Iran can effect, which is exactly what’s happening. It will take a while for the infrastructure to come online, but as the months and eventually years go by, Iran will find its biggest lever for control rapidly diminishing even if the war was stopped now. Likewise, the move to EV’s will likely accelerate.
Americans have proven passive enough that I don’t expect political/military change unless the democrats pull their head out of their ass long enough to win the 2026 November elections and start impeaching and prosecuting the trump regime.
foobiekr 16 minutes ago | parent
Buttons840 10 minutes ago | parent
edfsadfer 5 minutes ago | parent
I am old enough to have lived through the oil shocks in New Zealand. It got so bad the government rolled out an alternative fuel system network of compressed natural gas. Many fuel stations had installed the tanks and pumps and many cars were converted to it. NZ has gas deposits enough to meet all its own demands.
As soon as the oil shock was over it was all ripped out and we all went back to oil.
Buttons840 17 minutes ago | parent
A month or two ago they sent out an email asking common military members for ideas to deal with Iran. We've paid think tanks millions of dollars for plans like that. Guess they weren't worth anything in practice though.
nostrademons 49 minutes ago | parent
If these are the opening salvos of WW3 or even just a protracted regional Mideast war, yes you should get the EV. Experience in WW2 was that it became impossible to get petrol & diesel at any price. Supply lines would often be disrupted, and what petroleum products were available were usually allocated to the military.
If tensions die down after the midterms and eventually a peace accord or even stalemate is reached, you're looking at about 2-3 years of current prices. It'll take time to rebuild production in most Middle Eastern countries, many of which have had large oilfields, pipelines, and tanker loading facilities destroyed. You'll have to run the financials yourself of how much an EV costs, how much life you have left in your existing vehicle, and what local gas and electricity costs are, but I believe most EVs don't pencil out economically if it's just 2-3 years of current gas prices.
A third option is that everybody else (notably China and India) switches to EVs. If this happens gas will go down in price through reduced competition for it, and so you may be able to enjoy cheap gas for the remainder of your vehicle's lifetime. But note that in this scenario, you probably want to switch to an EV yourself, as eventually parts, repairs, and infrastructure for gas cars will become impossible to find.
Note that it is now outside of the control of the POTUS or U.S. military whether this conflict continues. They can prolong it, but they can't stop it. Recent aggression has been driven by Iran and its proxies, who are demonstrating that there is nothing the U.S. can do about it.
paulryanrogers 19 minutes ago | parent
peezd 44 minutes ago | parent
Which often aren't as visible as paying $82.00 to fill up your ICE vehicle, but add up to much more of an impact.
geoffbp 1 hour ago | parent
grebc 1 hour ago | parent
xboxnolifes 1 hour ago | parent
AnimalMuppet 1 hour ago | parent
grebc 54 minutes ago | parent
pipodeclown 1 hour ago | parent
bluGill 1 hour ago | parent
nutjob2 24 minutes ago | parent
CrzyLngPwd 55 minutes ago | parent
thefourthchime 51 minutes ago | parent
Of course most of it is, but it looks like the author put some care into this. It doesn't seem like a one off slop from Astra or anything.
Actually my favorite part is on the very bottom. The author attributes Qwen running on his local computer.
"Built with help from a local AI (Qwen 3.8-27b) running on an HP Omen 30L (RTX 3090) in my office."