17 points ddp26 57 minutes ago 8 comments
xgulfie 11 minutes ago | parent
Hasn't this been true for like 40 years
296012 9 minutes ago | parent
That is too bad for The Economist. Exor N.V and Agnelli might replace some pundits at The Economist.
glimshe 8 minutes ago | parent
Product idea: a LLM trained separately from mainline LLMs that anticipate market trends by analyzing how mainline LLMs will invest. As retail investors will probably use mainline AI for decisions going forward , one could get an edge.
"The AI-driven Market Hypothesis"
Please let me know where I should pick up my Nobel prize.
graypegg 6 minutes ago | parent
Then the next person needs an LLM trained to predict the LLM trained to predict the mainline LLM.
It's derivatives all the way down
codebastard 5 minutes ago | parent
Would you not then also copy the investments? Or are you trying to inverse the trades by an unpredictable time factor reasoning that thanks to AI the underlying stock is over- or underpriced?
croes 5 minutes ago | parent
Given the training data isn’t that more a win for the wisdom of the crowd?