12 points 0x63_Problems 1 day ago 11 comments

I'm the co-founder of Gauge, and I built ax-check.com to quickly test how well coding agents can onboard to your product.

You'll get a scorecard, specific suggested fixes, and three full coding sessions that show how agents read your site and use your product.

I built this because similar checks were too noisy. Most suggested obscure technical changes that don't actually make a difference in agent experience (or AX, hence ax-check.com).

This check starts by using DeepSeek 4.1 Flash to try to find key information about your product, starting from the homepage. In actual agent traffic data, we've seen that the key pages are the homepage, llms.txt, pricing, and the docs site (by traffic volume, and by influence), so we focus on those and ignore the rest. We also find that content negotiation for Markdown is legitimately helpful for agents to complete tasks faster and find what they're looking for, so the scan tests that your key pages can serve Markdown.

The other key piece is that we run actual coding agents in sandboxes, and have them try to onboard to your product. You can see the full trace and watch it happen live (we kick it off fresh when you enter a new site). We surface interesting findings like hallucinated URLs, inaccurate docs instructions, or product confusion.

It also detects whether the agents could complete a fully working onboarding autonomously, without being blocked by a login wall. This is still controversial, but I think finding ways to let agents safely onboard autonomously is going to be table stakes within a year for developer tools in particular.

The whole site is agent-friendly itself! You can generally just talk to your coding agent about ax-check.com and it can do the rest. Would really appreciate any feedback to make this useful.

eliaspro 27 minutes ago | parent

Nice! This should help in making my stuff as inaccessible as possible to agents.

0x63_Problems 13 minutes ago | parent

Are you mainly concerned about scraping? or anti-agents in general?

cyanydeez 10 minutes ago | parent

what is the benefit of making any resource more available to agents?

0x63_Problems 5 minutes ago | parent

Behind an agent is a human that might use the product. I think customers/consumers will demand that their personal/subscription agent can access the product.

xena 2 minutes ago | parent

As someone that works for a company that gets a 100% score on ax-check, all the effort I've put into making it accessible for agents has not 10xed the growth numbers like I was told it would.

pprotas 23 minutes ago | parent

https://news.ycombinator.com/ Gets an A grade for pricing… where is the pricing page again?

0x63_Problems 16 minutes ago | parent

The initial step of the scan looks at homepage content to try to figure out where to navigate next, it's getting confused by all the different products linked. Will fix this!

Farbod_memarian 22 minutes ago | parent

Going to try this out for our MCP

the1024 21 minutes ago | parent

How do you think about enabling fully agentic onboarding without proper human identification? It feels like any rate limiting would be pretty easy to get around.

0x63_Problems 7 minutes ago | parent

Each product is different (how much does it cost to serve a marginal user, how risky is it). But generally I think allowing ephemeral accounts like Cloudflare, or serving simulated/static accounts before a human claim can both work.

For a lot of products it can just be an extension of the free tier I think too.

mastrchief117 20 minutes ago | parent

I've been seeing these pop up recently, I think I saw Mintlify launched one too. Why the sudden increase in attention towards coding agents?