121 points skepticalgenius 1 hour ago 39 comments
kevinsimper 1 hour ago | parent
phoyd 1 hour ago | parent
CodesInChaos 42 minutes ago | parent
monsieurbanana 27 minutes ago | parent
As far as perennity is concerned it seems strictly better.
cube00 23 minutes ago | parent
csomar 18 minutes ago | parent
Torrent/P2P can only add redundancy, so it’s impossible to have worse availability than a download link?
_blk 13 minutes ago | parent
pell 5 minutes ago | parent
Opera did back in the day.
zenoprax 14 minutes ago | parent
You can see this with many Linux distros: there is no single Debian torrent that people seed for years because there's always a refreshed version.
Distros are a bad use case for P2P anyway since you depend on upstream as soon as you start upgrading and installing packages.
zenoprax 23 minutes ago | parent
If this site represents a coordinated datahoarding effort then there will be at least a few people who will seed indefinitely.
csomar 12 minutes ago | parent
It’s interesting he’s no longer getting any media attention any more.
ranger_danger 15 minutes ago | parent
bilegeek 11 minutes ago | parent
Retr0id 1 minute ago | parent
boredumb 2 minutes ago | parent
yieldcrv 54 minutes ago | parent
but I guess they are
skeledrew 53 minutes ago | parent
casper14 45 minutes ago | parent
mococa 42 minutes ago | parent
When StarCraft 2 was lauched, the installer (before Battle.net installer crapware) had a complete graphical visualization of seeders & leechers.
Reference: https://warcraft.wiki.gg/wiki/Blizzard_Downloader
alexpotato 38 minutes ago | parent
To get the file out to 100s or 1000s of machine they would often use private bittorent to distribute the file out.
mococa 35 minutes ago | parent
bayindirh 19 minutes ago | parent
Once I was using Blizzard's downloader to install something (StarCraft, Diablo, I don't remember), and it was kinda slow. I disabled P2P downloads and speed skyrocketed, and I said "Huh, this was unexpected".
When P2P downloads disabled you could see the list of CDNs you're downloading from and mine had a single IP on that list. It looked familiar. Then it dawned on to me. It was the Akamai server which we were hosting in our system room, at 15 minutes of driving distance. After a chuckle, I went to get a cup of tea, because that was entertaining than the game itself.
Then of course, I dived into whatever I was installing that night.
Aurornis 11 minutes ago | parent
It was very controversial. Users were angry that software companies were using their internet bandwidth to distribute their software. Made a lot of people angry.
bananaflag 42 minutes ago | parent
reilly3000 36 minutes ago | parent
grommz 34 minutes ago | parent
sneurlax 31 minutes ago | parent
behole 24 minutes ago | parent
hgoel 20 minutes ago | parent
Though I have been disappointed that most of these have been spurred on by the misleading claim that abliterated models were being taken down from HuggingFace because they removed an abliterated model. HF took one abliterated model down because the uploader was spamming people who requested access with sketchy requirements to pay for it.
Plus, there are a bunch of these types of sites, all of them have a couple of models and otherwise completely dead.
There's also the problem of catching malicious models that have been fine tuned to exfiltrate credentials. It would be nice to have means of checking hashes against the HF versions (or against other reputable sources). I'm guessing this is probably easy when just serving the same folder as what HF serves.
wren6991 12 minutes ago | parent
Orthogonalising activations at runtime is computationally cheap. Just distribute the refusal vectors (few thousand floats per layer), then run against the stock weights. Antirez's DS4 already supports this: https://github.com/antirez/ds4/blob/8db1d1d155cb0400a86a86b9...
Abliterated weights are just a bad habit we've gotten into. It's also deeply suboptimal from a precision point of view to take a model that's already been QATed and distributed in pre-quantised form (DeepSeek V4, Kimi K2.5 or K3...), modify its weights, and re-quantise it. Similarly, abliterated models regain some of their refusal behaviour when they're re-quantised after abliteration -- avoidable by keeping the two separate.
jamienk 5 minutes ago | parent
I haven't wrapped my mind around this
mitxela 2 minutes ago | parent
Razengan 10 minutes ago | parent
wolfy1993 8 minutes ago | parent
Really odd approach.