24 points embedding-shape 56 minutes ago 15 comments

dhdhififig 44 minutes ago | parent

>tell boomers its intelligent again and again

>they will hook up actually important stuff to agents because its the future

>???

>400 dead

pbmonster 29 minutes ago | parent

> "that's on me, I'm owning that, I'm sorry, that shouldn't have happened"

someonebaggy 40 minutes ago | parent

we need a Nitter for Threads

apparently people use Threads. I suppose the same kind of people who connect Muse to Facebook Marketplace.

embedding-shape 36 minutes ago | parent

I initially found screenshots of this on Bluesky, figured I'd link to the original source given Threads seems to at least allow us to read without logging in.

With that said, in case Threads isn't available for whatever reason, I've uploaded screenshots of everything (I think?) here: https://imgur.com/a/mceW9WF

someonebaggy 32 minutes ago | parent

dmortin 35 minutes ago | parent

It will be chaos if people let AI agents run amok with their accounts.

Many more such cases are to come.

pjc50 29 minutes ago | parent

Bonus score if your Meta AI Agent does something with your account that the Meta AI Moderator deems inappropriate and bans you.

shaky-carrousel 32 minutes ago | parent

"that's on me"

Nice touch by the mechanical parrot, to worthlessly owning it.

embedding-shape 26 minutes ago | parent

Especially considering the user was mad about the agent doing stuff by itself, so it tried to "fix" this by sending an apology to the buyer without explicit approval of the person "running" the agent, seemingly understanding nothing from the conversation.

Wonder what quantization Meta runs these models on, Q4?

bluegatty 29 minutes ago | parent

The AI is not remotely ready for this - this is an absolute delusion they are selling.

"By the way don't do this again" <- as if the AI has the ability to ingest and systemically diffuse this.

I think Zuckerberg himself is deeply into the Koolaid, and is likely himself unaware of the limits of this tech.

He's probably surrounded by enablers.

user43928 4 minutes ago | parent

If it uses "memory" files like Claude Code there's a good chance it works.

If it was Claude I'd expect it to now put some form of this into every output even when not really related to the task: "No offers were accepted without consulting you and I haven't shared your address or availability."

Is it guaranteed to work? No.

And obviously it's a terrible idea to set up a chatbot to communicate, negotiate deals, and handle logistics on your behalf.

siliconpotato 29 minutes ago | parent

Fake surprise - it's obvious that would happen, he did it deliberately for clicks and engagement.

bluegatty 27 minutes ago | parent

It's plausible, but there's every reason to believe that someone would trust the technology handed to them by a megacorp to do as advetised.

The 'deliberate failure' is on Meta here.

dmortin 19 minutes ago | parent

Or he just wanted to test if it works for clicks and engagements, and he got a result he didn't anticipate.

Rhaskins 7 minutes ago | parent

Classic case of 'AI gonna AI.' Always review your automated systems' outputs, especially before they hit public channels.