9 points nine_ch 2 hours ago 6 comments
majke 48 minutes ago | parent
8. 80.239.216.210. 0.0% 78 123.2 64.6 42.9 141.8 30.6
9. vl202.zur-itx1-dist-1.cdn77.com. 0.0% 78 60.1 58.8 43.7 136.5 24.2
10. 89-187-165-194.bunnyinfra.net. 0.0% 78 45.9 63.5 41.8 131.9 31.0
so cdn77.com and bunny.netnine_ch 38 minutes ago | parent
Yes, that's bunny.net, it's named in the post. Their Zurich PoP appears to sit on CDN77's network, which is on their side of the setup, not something we configured.
jareklupinski 41 minutes ago | parent
> There was no unauthorised access and no compromised systems. This was an overload attack, not an intrusion.
"AI said it's all good. There are no attackers within our walls."
tshanmu 37 minutes ago | parent
"We found three concrete gaps during this incident, and we would rather be upfront about them than gloss over them." claudism?
someonebaggy 37 minutes ago | parent
Did AI write this?
nine_ch 33 minutes ago | parent
Yes. The blog version was drafted with AI assistance and then edited and reviewed by us. The facts, numbers and timeline are ours and match the technical postmortem PDF linked in the post, which is the drier, more complete version. Happy to go into any of the technical details here.