58 points amortize 1 day ago 10 comments

nmehner 13 hours ago | parent

"inventing work" = "requirements engineering"

"Inventing work" is a strange phrase to use imho.

mytydev 7 hours ago | parent

I was thinking the same thing. The word that I would be more inclined to use is used multiple times throughout the article. Discovery.

qrush 58 minutes ago | parent

Agreed. A better framing would be "defining work".

theanonymousone 36 minutes ago | parent

Or "proactive engineering"

arealaccount 55 minutes ago | parent

I thought this was going to be an article about slacking off with style

groestl 36 minutes ago | parent

I think it's a fundamental difference in philosophy. Does the work exist, and you discover it? Or does it start existing as soon as you think about it? This person seems to subscribe to the latter world view.

theanonymousone 34 minutes ago | parent

In their defence, requirements engineering is somehow reactive sounding to me, while "this thing" is kind of "proactive".

cush 24 minutes ago | parent

yeah I thought the post was going to be satirical

gloryjulio 18 minutes ago | parent

Requirements engineering still applies to senior engineers. You are given a problem and you need to work out the requirements and the path to completion.

But for staff engineers, they need to to discover the scope themselves. That's where "inventing" coming from. Not saying inventing is a good word here, but requirement alone is not enough for staff level's work

juancn 24 minutes ago | parent

I use the "what's going to kill us next" philosophy. Figure out what that is and do something to avoid it.

Wash, rinse, repeat.