24 points jacquesm 1 hour ago 8 comments
nater5000 43 minutes ago | parent
If you're interested in an anti-AI article which isn't just the same trite takes you've already read a million times before, just move along. Go read a HN thread about any recent AI news and you'll get the same takes.
Animats 35 minutes ago | parent
If you go there, you get a popup: "Click to claim AI offer".
dgellow 32 minutes ago | parent
One of the author has a pretty impressive Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timnit_Gebru
square_usual 31 minutes ago | parent
Why should anyone listen to Timnit Gebru or Emily Blender after how consistently they've been wrong about everything? What insight or value do they bring to this?
dgellow 25 minutes ago | parent
What have they been wrong about? What is wrong in the article?
bitpush 19 minutes ago | parent
I believe the objection is because they are constantly negative, even before LLMs were a fraction of its usefulness today.
Every technology has its negative parts, but breathlessly pointing out the negatives gets really old.
dgellow 14 minutes ago | parent
Do you mean critical? They are expert in AI ethics, it’s pretty much their job to look for problems in the field. I’m not familiar with them but the posted article covers facts that are undeniable