205 points dachworker 3 hours ago 174 comments

rusk 2 hours ago | parent

Cries in dystopian

7speter 2 hours ago | parent

Just as long as the CEO’s name isn’t Robert House, I guess

jdkfofofo 2 hours ago | parent

Hype for the inevitable NYSE IPO!

vrganj 2 hours ago | parent

Capital Markets union is coming :-)

eptcyka 2 hours ago | parent

Will this also be a Russian scam?

mhitza 2 hours ago | parent

What is this a reference to?

pepperoni_pizza 2 hours ago | parent

How dare you!

Germans are totally capable of their own scams (see Dieselgate or Berlin airport or ...).

vantablackblack 1 hour ago | parent

They are going hard with the downvotes, maybe they should be as self righteous when it comes to not committing fraud at a national level for once

chmod775 1 hour ago | parent

No, we're quite happy doing that. However on behalf of the German people I wish to thank everyone involved for the thoughtful suggestions and intelligent way to approach a possibly interesting topic. I can tell your hearts and minds are in the right place.

The downvotes are puzzling.

eptcyka 54 minutes ago | parent

I don't think it is a uniquely German thing to trust the old institutions - which I think is what allowed Wirecard to do wire fraud. I'd say all of Western Europe is rather naive to Kremlin's shenanigans.

Rapzid 1 hour ago | parent

Or AfD

rbanffy 1 hour ago | parent

AfD is hardly a scam. They promise nazism and they deliver it.

Rapzid 1 hour ago | parent

Yeah, but Nazism was a scam.

askl 2 hours ago | parent

I was expecting to be disappointed at seeing another humanoid robot that can fold laundry BS startup.

But it looks like they're trying to build something that is actually useful.

lolakutty 2 hours ago | parent

folding laundry is not useful?

intrasight 2 hours ago | parent

Definitely not. I have laundry that I hang. Everything else goes unfolded into sorted bins. Of course it drives my wife crazy, and if she takes my laundry out of the dryer, she folds it. What drives her more crazy is that I proceed to just dump it in the bins.

HPsquared 1 hour ago | parent

Better to put the items on hangers.

schnitzelstoat 1 hour ago | parent

It would be. But it also feels like the "Can it run Crysis?" of robotics.

By the time we get robots capable of folding laundry, we'd already have solved many, many other use-cases.

layer8 40 minutes ago | parent

If it would work, it would be mildly useful. Actually, if it would work, that would be more exciting by itself than it would be useful. But it doesn’t, really.

mohamedkoubaa 38 minutes ago | parent

It is about as useful as robot that chews your food for you

skrebbel 2 hours ago | parent

I assume you got a spouse or parent do all the laundry for you? I’m not sure you realize how spoiled you sound.

Seriously a laundry folding robot excites me much more than a CLI that can generate code. I enjoy generating code myself! I don’t enjoy laundry. Total killer app.

askl 2 hours ago | parent

> I assume you got a spouse or parent do all the laundry for you? I’m not sure you realize how spoiled you sound.

What a weird accusation. I do this myself, it takes like half an hour a week and is actually quite relaxing.

I'm not sure you realize how spoiled people sound who would spend thousands of dollars to replace such an insignificant inconvenience.

skrebbel 2 hours ago | parent

At the risk of making yet another wrong assumption, that sounds like you don’t have a family?

Fwiw laundry takes a pretty significant chunk out of my weekend. I wouldn't spend “thousands of dollars” to reduce it but at around the price of a new phone I’m totally in the market.

askl 1 hour ago | parent

Yeah, that assumption is correct. So doing laundry for others as well wasn't really something I was considering.

dachworker 2 hours ago | parent

I just found out about them. To me it seems their core product is "boring" industrial robots with some AI fluff on top, which imho is smart because you can capaitalize on the hype without having it be pivotal to their entire business model. What I find interesting is the robot-as-a-service model.

igleria 2 hours ago | parent

what is it with people choosing evil corpo names

Findecanor 2 hours ago | parent

Indeed. The name was well established in the popular Fallout game series before this company was founded.

airstrike 2 hours ago | parent

Effective in this attention economy.

Eyerolling to anyone with half a brain.

But maybe most people don't have half a brain.

rbanffy 1 hour ago | parent

A couple decades ago, in Brazil, the parking lot used next to a popular Microsoft training center was called South Park. The contact e-mail was "cartman@southpark.com.br".

SillyUsername 2 hours ago | parent

The fact a defence company is also called Stark is quite amusing, if not for the deadly weapons.

someonebaggy 2 hours ago | parent

Evil often wins and makes a lot of money. Also effective if your target audience is evil billionaires with brain rot.

this one doesn't sound that evil though? Just a simple portmanteau that may not sound as stupid in German?

ajmurmann 11 minutes ago | parent

It doesn't sound evil but is a evil company in the Fallout video games and tv show

napkid 1 hour ago | parent

Reminds me of the first time I heard about the "Palantir" company...

Edit : typo

fluxflexer 1 hour ago | parent

I guess in this category, those guys are unbeatable: https://www.mordorintelligence.com/

ngruhn 1 hour ago | parent

I will name my company BlackApex Inc

pjc50 1 hour ago | parent

Reminded of how someone took "Universal Robotics" from the Asimov novels and used it to sell .. modems.

fifilura 2 hours ago | parent

"Existing investors including Sequoia, Lightspeed, Greenfield, Kindred, Lingotto and Promus Ventures participated alongside new backers Cherry Ventures and European Tech Collective."

What share of the investor money is from USA?

petcat 1 hour ago | parent

Sequoia, Lightspeed, and Promus are American. Greenfield is Israeli, and Kindred Capital is British.

Don't know about Lingotto. Looks Italian.

Cherry Ventures is the only German investor. ETC is EU.

perlgeek 1 hour ago | parent

Technically, this doesn't answer the question, which was about investment money, not about the investment firms.

giancarlostoro 1 hour ago | parent

Still helps get you to a more accurate answer to know which firms investments to scrutinize no?

ghostly_s 1 hour ago | parent

No, not really. That's info the OP could easily Google. The answer to their actual question can only be provided by someone with inside knowledge or access to paywalled trade publications.

giancarlostoro 1 hour ago | parent

I'm not familiar with German law / investing, but if they're public here in the US, they have to disclose amounts to investors. If they're not on the stock market, then yeah, unless German law mandates it, we may never know.

ghostly_s 56 minutes ago | parent

It's a startup, not a public company. I didn't know what you think your assumptions based on the US are bringing to the conversation. Not Posting is Always an Option.

giancarlostoro 10 minutes ago | parent

You're misunderstanding: the companies doing the investing, if they're publicly traded companies HAVE to report these sorts of things in their finance reports. This is why when these companies buy out other companies they make announcements about amounts, and if they've sold off anything, this, that and the third.

When I worked for KeyW Corporation I had shares with the company, and every time they did anything they made announcements, like if they acquired someone. I had left the company and during my leave Jacobs Engineering bought out KeyW, sold off some of their own business endeavours and paid off all of KeyW's debt and shifted their focus towards government contracting and less so in oil infrastrcuture (if I remember correctly, Jacobs is a big company). This was all publicly announced.

The startup doesn't need to disclose anything, but if a public company invested in them, they will eventually have to do a quarterly report and disclose it.

konschubert 1 hour ago | parent

I don’t know what the point is that you’re making.

I read it as confirmation that there is apparently no shortage of investor money in Europe, since US investors are willing and able to invest here.

mrtksn 1 hour ago | parent

Being EU company is so hard, you can never pass the purity tests.

Reminds me of this: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/vHfbUIQeW_A

You move to USA from a 3rd world country, take money from the Americans, Arabs and the Chinese, hire bunch of Israeli, Pakistani, Canadians, Romanians and Russian engineers and and you become an American success story.

You found a robotics company in Germany and you instantly fail the purity test, you are American company if you took too much US money, you are actually Polish if you hired too many Polish engineers etc.

It's just weird attitude.

ghostly_s 1 hour ago | parent

IDK why all these replies are assuming OP was insinuating some negative judgement. To me, it's interesting that US investors are apparently interested in this EU firm that is pursuing the US market, despite no shortage of US startups in the same space.

mrtksn 59 minutes ago | parent

Probably because no one is questioning the nationality of the money on any US startups?

bonoboTP 46 minutes ago | parent

Isn't the big money always American (in startups in the US and Europe)? What example do you have in mind? I don't mean the human-scale money risked by some immigrant, I mean the big money.

fifilura 56 minutes ago | parent

It matters who owns the company. Where your employees come from matters much less.

As long as there is no investors from Europe, these startups will just be a money funnel to America.

mrtksn 52 minutes ago | parent

Invest then?

jurgenburgen 49 minutes ago | parent

It’s not listed.

mrtksn 47 minutes ago | parent

It doesn't have to be, notice how they already have investors despite not being listed.

jurgenburgen 45 minutes ago | parent

You’re right. Let me break open my kids piggy bank and grab a few million.

layer8 50 minutes ago | parent

Isn’t that naturally a function of who owns the most available investor money globally?

fifilura 46 minutes ago | parent

Also risk appetite.

Note specifically, my emphasis.

"alongside new backers Cherry Ventures and European Tech Collective"

askonomm 52 minutes ago | parent

Yeah well HN is predominantly for and by American audiences I think and that already explains a lot of the attitude towards non-USA. A lot of Americans seem to think they are the main character in every story, and even if they are not, they try their best to somehow alter the narrative until they are.

mrtksn 49 minutes ago | parent

AFAIK there are many companies that just create an HQ in USA for the attitude when all the work is done in Poland or Turkey etc.

jurgenburgen 46 minutes ago | parent

The CEO did move to the US “to focus on the fastest growing market”. Usually that means that they start building an engineering org there and embracing a more US working culture.

Feels like eventually this company ends up being based there and no longer an “EU” company.

mrtksn 9 minutes ago | parent

To be fair, it all depends on the definition you choose. It's often useless to have a general definition. If you try really hard you can claim that Apple is an Irish company or Chinese company. I always buy my MacBooks From Ireland and I can track it arriving from China.

bonoboTP 44 minutes ago | parent

No need to be defensive. It's simply true, and I say that as a European. The money and attitude required for it is just not present in Europe. German money is much more conservative and risk averse. So the funding will have to be from the US. It's perfectly justified to roll one's eyes when these cases are presented as if Europe could produce these companies by itself.

pjc50 1 hour ago | parent

Money is effectively global these days. A lot of the money in the AI bubble is from all over the place, including Saudi funds and the ubiquitous Softbank.

It matters more where the money goes, in this case into European innovation.

People demanding the perfect isolated national champion that takes no foreign money, no foreign workers, no foreign inputs, and uses no foreign services are going to be disappointed.

konschubert 1 hour ago | parent

I don’t know what the point is that you’re hinting at?

I read it as confirmation that there is apparently no shortage of investor money in Europe, since US investors are willing and able to invest here.

petcat 3 minutes ago | parent

The risk of having primarily foreign, especially American, investors is that the company will leave the EU. Like what we just saw happen with Heart Aerospace [1]. EU needs its own investors.

[1] https://www.heartaerospace.com/newsroom/heart-aerospace-relo...

Rebuff5007 2 hours ago | parent

> Robotics-as-a-Service model

Oof. Amazed that venture-backed robotics companies are still interested in making this work.

skrebbel 2 hours ago | parent

Why not? Huge companies like Schlumberger work on a similar model. I mean these are not AI businesses (yet) but commercially the model is the same: develop gear in house and rent it out together with the specialists who operate it.

spwa4 1 hour ago | parent

Most AI is not subscription but pay-per-use (I guess for an industrial robot that would mean pay per action the robot does), and that is a big part of why everybody piles into AI.

Rebuff5007 15 minutes ago | parent

In practice, what this means is that a relatively immature startup takes on immense technological risk by having to invest in the capex and deploy a solution, all while being at the mercy of their customers to give them enough time and access to get the solution to any reasonable production standard. Usually robotics companies never get to that mark.

I believe theres on the order of 100s of millions in losses across a number of robotics companies that have attempted this in the last 10 years.

inglor_cz 2 hours ago | parent

Imagine a robot bricklayer. Some big construction companies may buy them outright, but for smaller projects, it makes sense to simply rent them.

crote 2 hours ago | parent

Those have existed for quite a while now. For smaller projects it is cheaper to get a human.

HPsquared 1 hour ago | parent

Cheaper, for now.

inglor_cz 1 hour ago | parent

If you can get him in time, plus are willing to risk unknown quality of his work. Reliable professionals tend to be booked long in advance, at least where I live.

ovi256 1 hour ago | parent

Depending on the task, a human doing it may be highly discouraged by H&S regulations, or the insurer.

Even on individual small building sites in France I'm now seeing mini-diggers instead of human shoveling, everywhere, or tile elevators (for a 3 man roofing team!) instead of the stereotypical exploited immigrant manual labourer. These are justified by insurers quoting such a high price for covering the expected accident and long term health costs of human shoveling or tile carrying to roofs that buying the machines is cheaper.

someonebaggy 2 hours ago | parent

aaS means you don't even rent them, you just pay someone to come and lay a certain number of bricks by any means necessary.

Airplane engine manufacturers retain ownership of their engines, and sell kilonewton-hours to airlines.

ElevenLathe 1 hour ago | parent

I don't know enough about airline finance to understand if this is a simplification or not. Are engine users really billed by the kilonewton-hour or by something simpler like a service hour? It seems like kN-h would be a hard thing to meter to everyone's satisfaction and some simpler proxy would do just as well.

Xixi 1 hour ago | parent

"Under TotalCare, an airline pays Rolls-Royce a fixed rate per engine flying hour." [0] Not quite kN-h indeed. But the idea is similar (and more simple to implement, I suppose): you don't really own the engine, you pay for what you use.

[0] https://www.meritshot.com/rolls-royce-case-study

EDIT: wording

dachworker 2 hours ago | parent

Huh? I thought that was their entire selling point. That you can have a factory that needs retooling and instead of having to carefully plan and buy robots yourself, you can hire these guys instead.

pjc50 1 hour ago | parent

AI as a service is hugely successful, at least on the stockmarket.

It makes more sense for complicated products, and things where any one user's demand is uneven. Industrial "plant" construction equipment is often leased for similar reasons.

trolleski 2 hours ago | parent

Ain't that a kick in the head?

x0z 1 hour ago | parent

Ain't that a hole in the boat!

nicman23 42 minutes ago | parent

that is what a fellow once said

tonyhart7 2 hours ago | parent

so the website is basically called it physical AI

airstrike 2 hours ago | parent

I understand why humans get fixated on the nominal threshold of a large, round number like $1B.

But the thing about private market valuations is that you can't know if investors are right ex ante, so it's helpful to discount.

A $1B valuation sort of just means you now effectively "owe it" to shareholders, and you're now 100% incentivized to deliver that to them in some form, instead of being fully incentivized to deliver on your true vision to your customer.

When done well, private diligence can help uncover blind spots and fund company growth in key areas at the service of that true vision.

When done poorly because of FOMO over AI, robotics, or the latest hype, it can turn into preemptive enshittification.

mertbio 2 hours ago | parent

The comments here are just another reminder of how US-centric HN has become. Whenever there's positive news from Germany or elsewhere in Europe, people are quick to dismiss it. But the moment there's negative news, everyone jumps on the bandwagon to bash it.

vrganj 2 hours ago | parent

People here work in the US tech bubble. The behavior you describe is indicative of fear.

tsak 2 hours ago | parent

news.ycombinator.eu

SCNR

kroyblen 2 hours ago | parent

Well, it seems their fastest growing market (and largest?) is in the USA.

They, per the article, have set up manufacturing there and a research lab in SF.

The co-founder has also relocated to the USA.

Much of the dismissal I think doesn’t come from a bad place - people see potential in europe, why can’t it a similar market?

philipallstar 2 hours ago | parent

Who is dismissing it?

Tade0 1 hour ago | parent

There was an interesting study showing that while social mobility is generally greater in Europe than in the US, the European tendency to underestimate vs American to overestimate it, results in broad agreement that social mobility is in fact greater in the US.

Poking holes in every new idea is a pan-European pastime - it's how people in this region of the world managed to survive despite exhausting its resources.

4949599559 39 minutes ago | parent

Surely you can cite the study

amelius 2 hours ago | parent

What is the SOTA in AI for robotics today? Is there much progress? Or is everybody too much focused on the LLMs now?

lukan 2 hours ago | parent

Why do you think it is separated?

https://deepmind.google/models/gemini-robotics/

And not sure what RobCo is doing exactly, but LLMs are probably part of it as well.

msdz 1 hour ago | parent

Some further reading on the LLM-and-robotics aspect in addition to your link:

https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen-robotsuite

https://drivingbench.com/

grandma_tea 1 hour ago | parent

I'm not sure if I would consider tech demos like this state of the art. They look impressive and they do show promise but there's a huge gap between an impressive demo and a usable product. This goes for Google Gemini as well.

amelius 1 hour ago | parent

Ehm, I didn't say they needed to be separated :)

The link looks great, but was hoping for more research-oriented details.

NalNezumi 46 minutes ago | parent

Two aspects: industry & research (worked in both).

Research is using a lot of VLM (or whatever Jim Fan decided to call them this year) when it comes to manipulation (robot arm). For navigation it is still a little mixed bag, best to see self driving advancement for that. On the control side (cool jumping humanoid) it's a mixture of RL/IL and traditional control(MPC) and running a slow ass VLM/LLM is not an option.

SOTA is hard to say in the sense that there's just so much variation to the task you want to measure. This can be considered SOTA in one aspect https://youtu.be/3aQWvdCac9o As it's an robot that can lift a heavy unknown object without information about it, RL trained in simulation, but at the same time trained eye will see that the task is made simple by fridge being put on a pallet making the bottom of it exposed for grabbing. On the other hand you have PI (Chelsea Finn / Sergey Levine) https://youtu.be/cRZNwgvcWUg that can do nothing of the thing above but can cook food and fold shirts. Deformable objects and tools interaction is hard so their demo is more focused on understanding and interacting with the world compared to the fine motion like the Boston dynamics one. The latter is also teleoperated, and teleoperation tend to look good but have pretty sad deployment success %

Industry is... Depends on startup vs established. VLA/LLM is flashy but really even 95% success rate is not enough for factory/logistics automation if the failure is unrecoverable, and VLM/LLM is far, faaaaaaaaaaaar from that success rate. In controlled settings traditional pipeline of detection + motion planning often outperform VLM/LLM hybrid models by a mile. Established ones have run humanleess logistic centers for many years now and they're seldom VLA stuff, although there is an interest in using it for the 5% failure cases. But they're not interested in SOTA.

mohamedkoubaa 39 minutes ago | parent

Even if VLA reaches 100% success rate it still isn't viable. No factory operator wants a cloud hosted model in the critical path. And nobody is (yet) building a server rack that can be air gapped in the factory to run VLA, and these models don't run on a Mac Mini. Probably an opportunity for something like Oxide to pick up, but they have more profitable segments to go after.

ramesh31 2 hours ago | parent

Isn't the $1B unicorn number from like 2015? I feel like that's a pretty typical series A/B valuation at this point.

speed_spread 2 hours ago | parent

For Silicon Valley, maybe. But this is Europe, where things are still rooted in reality.

flanked-evergl 1 hour ago | parent

Nothing about Europe's policy has been realistic for decades now. The whole of Europe is a vassal of the US and exists at the mercy of the Americans. If they withdraw support Europe is no longer viable.

DerGalaxy 1 hour ago | parent

must be sarcasm. must be

flanked-evergl 1 hour ago | parent

If Europe was not a vassal of the US why do we refuse to stand on our own legs? Why is almost every decision of ours predicated on US participation? Europe will give guarantees to Ukraine but only if USA puts boots on the ground. Europe will secure the Hormuz straight but only once USA has secured it. It's pathetic and embarrassing.

Europe shut down more than 20 Diesel refineries in the past 20 years and then we cry that Diesel is too expensive and blame the Americans. Pathetic.

Our industrial and energy policy is that we will become completely dependent on the Middle East, US, Russia and China so we have absolutely no autonomy and no viability. Embarrassing. Pathetic. Shameful.

ctolsen 1 hour ago | parent

Diesel prices are high because of the Americans, blaming them is entirely correct.

flanked-evergl 1 hour ago | parent

If Europe did not shut down 30 refineries since 2009 the premium of Disel over crude oil would be a lot lower than it is today: https://x.com/BjornLomborg/status/2105736980072153328

If Europe did not shut down domestic energy production and oil and gas extraction in order to buy oil and gas from Russia then oil and gas would be a lot cheaper today.

Blaming the Americans for what we did to ourselves is insane and rooted in deep ignorance of what actually happened in Europe in the past two decades.

But yet again this just shows how totally dependent we in Europe are on Americans for everything. Pathetic.

palata 1 hour ago | parent

> Europe will secure the Hormuz straight but only once USA has secured it.

Wasn't the Hormuz straight perfectly fine before the USA decided to... well do whatever they did?

flanked-evergl 57 minutes ago | parent

Europe destroyed domestic energy production and oil and gas extraction in order to make itself entirely dependent first on Russia, then on the Middle East for energy. It was not the Jews or the Americans that forced us to do that. It was our politicians that we elected that did that. And for what? How does it benefit us? Now everyone is crying about insane fossil fuel prices after our policy for more than a decade was to make fossil fuel non-viable. Pathetic.

palata 53 minutes ago | parent

Well Europe doesn't have more fossil fuels to extract, does it?

bix6 1 hour ago | parent

There are under 2k private unicorns so it’s still a worthwhile metric. $1B is a proper business.

The next level up of decacorn is sub 100 so if we only tracked that it’d be a bit limited.

ramesh31 1 hour ago | parent

>"The next level up of decacorn is sub 100 so if we only tracked that it’d be a bit limited."

That's kind of the point though, isn't it?

fusslo 1 hour ago | parent

I'm not sure if the following has any point, really.

First, my father worked as an industrial mechanic in an amazon distribution hub. But he couldn't touch any of the automation. Amazon would bring in German contractors for months at a time to work on the robots, conveyor belts, automation hardware. They made 2.5-3x my father, had 6 weeks vacation, didn't pay for lodging in the US. To me, Amazon's idea of US jobs were the backbreaking labor 'pickers' and 'sorters'.

Second, half my professional career has been in office/factory configurations. Where the engineering offices are glued onto some factory. We're HEAVILY invested in automation. The factory workers are barebones crew designated by union minimums. We have a team of 2-5 people (really, 2 engineers, 3 technicians) who design, build, program, and maintain automated stations. Ranging from a robotic arm picking different components in the correct amounts and putting them in a box, heavy forklift-like robots moving product around, and robotic arms performing some manufacturing task.

What happens when those 2 engineers get sick? or retire? One guy who built half the factory is in his 50s. the line could go down with no backup.

Why haven't we hired like 3 junior people to apprentice with the senior guys? They make machines that make money! The new investment in people is happening in Germany, Poland, Scandinavia

Maybe I'm wayyyy off the mark, but investing in "US Manufacturing" by importing automation (whether it's from the EU or Asia or anywhere else) probably won't end well and seems like marketing.

schnitzelstoat 1 hour ago | parent

Engineering salaries in the EU are far lower than in the US though.

They probably just used the Germans because they are cheaper.

tw04 1 hour ago | parent

Based on what data? A quick google search says the average automation engineer in Germany makes 90k euro to $107k in the US.

And the German has universal healthcare, clocks out at 5 and can’t be bothered, and gets real vacation time.

https://www.salaryexpert.com/salary/job/automation-engineer/

ph4rsikal 1 hour ago | parent

Maybe the engineer makes 90K, but there are still thousands in social contributions. Can be up to 15K.

larnon 1 hour ago | parent

You can't trust a quick google search nowadays for anything. I work in Germany. Any engineer making that much money has to be a senior at a higher position with loads of responsibilities (which means the average is nowhere near), plus living in a city that is considered expensive. Also, half that money goes to taxes. (someone has to pay for the universal healthcare afterall)

flohofwoe 1 hour ago | parent

That "health care argument" is getting a bit tiring tbh. The US government spends much more than any European country per capita on health care (the US system is simply less efficient), and the chunk of your wage that goes into your health insurance isn't a tax either.

usewik 58 minutes ago | parent

Who is making this 'health care argument' you are responding to?

flohofwoe 51 minutes ago | parent

Maybe fully read the comment I'm responding to? The implication is that European countries (and especially Germany) spend an extraordinary amount of tax money on health care and that's why taxes are so high. This is basically wrong from start to finish. You also don't pay half of your wage in taxes in Germany. The chunk that's removed from your gross wage before pay out includes your mandatory employee insurances (health-, pension- and unemployment-insurances), and that's how you end up "losing" about 30% to 45% of your gross salary before pay out (the actual "tax part" is somewhere between 10 and 25% depending on income, marriage status etc...)

groundzeros2015 25 minutes ago | parent

US consumers also have high standards for healthcare.

I interact with a lot of engineers moving from Europe and US and it’s never how US politics portray it. German friends talk about paying for private insurance because the public one is so bad.

flohofwoe 19 minutes ago | parent

Complaining about the service quality for public health insurance customers in Germany is pretty much the definition of "first world problem" though. FWIW I never switched over to private insurance even though my income would allow it, also once you get above a certain age you can't switch back and that's when the private insurers really start to rip you off ;)

groundzeros2015 15 minutes ago | parent

And despite that they are willing to pay, because if you are out of poverty your health is a high priority!

So yes, Americans love consuming healthcare. Is there any category they aren’t a high consumer of? You can’t measure efficiency only looking at the input side.

flohofwoe 9 minutes ago | parent

I think the main reason why high income Germans switch to private health insurance is less about service quality, but because they may actually pay less than public insurance (at least until they get near pension age). Can't talk for US citizens of course.

aktenlage 1 hour ago | parent

> half that money goes to taxes

That is a misguided simplification. Please correct this, before anyone starts to believe it for real.

usewik 56 minutes ago | parent

Having worked in another EU country, I can attest that I paid as much as 56% in taxes, so I believe a guy who says that he works in Germany and pays half in taxes. If you have other data, you are welcome to present it.

chmod775 49 minutes ago | parent

If you make 90k in Germany, you pay around 36k to mandatory (varying degrees) insurance/pension plus taxes if you're single. About 19.5k of that are actual taxes. If you're married/have children that total can drop to ~30k and will include health insurance for your entire family unit.

criddell 24 minutes ago | parent

If these people are to be believed, tax freedom day (the day you stop paying taxes and start paying yourself) in Germany is July 11 so just over 50%.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_Freedom_Day

ajmurmann 22 minutes ago | parent

Don't forget VAT

chmod775 56 minutes ago | parent

You however have to admire getting things that wrong in the same paragraph that tells one to not trust what one sees in Google searches. Though I suppose HN comments would show in Google searches... maybe their humor just went over my head.

alberto-m 45 minutes ago | parent

More precisely, given a salary of 85'000€, about 17'500 (20.5%) goes into income tax and about 16'800 (19.7%) goes into social contributions, though one can reduce the latter by taking a private health insurance*. The remaining 60% (Nettolohn) can be used to purchase things, usually paying 19% of VAT on them (though rent is exempt and food has a lower tax).

So, “half goes away in taxes” is an exaggeration, but I can totally sympathize with the feeling. Especially since the quality of healthcare is declining and the pay-as-you-go pension system is only built to benefit the current generation of pensioners.

* note that, if one is earning less than 77'000€ today or less than 84'150€ in 2027, one is prohibited to switch to a private insurance. One of the most regressive precepts of the German system.

sva_ 34 minutes ago | parent

I think you should also mention the ~17k Euro social contributions that your employer pays on top, which could otherwise be part of your salary. Then it is actually pretty much 50%

alberto-m 22 minutes ago | parent

Correct: if one takes as basis not the Bruttolohn but the total cost for the company, the sum of taxes and mandatory social contribution can very well reach the half of the income. The method of splitting employer-side and employee-side deductions seems just there to hide this fact.

KellyCriterion 11 minutes ago | parent

There are two terms in German salary:

"visible" and "invisble" Brutto. The one is without "contributions from employer", which is a lie anyway since an employer makes a total comp perspective and he for sure includes his "contribution" into that

sajithdilshan 30 minutes ago | parent

Don’t forget the mandatory radio broadcast fee every household has to pay even if you don’t read or watch any of those propaganda channels

kuerbel 27 minutes ago | parent

>One of the most regressive precepts of the German system.

If you mean the existence of two-tier private/public insurance, yes. The two-tier system was abolished in most of Europe for good reason. Either they abolished substitutive private insurance, restricted it, or transformed private insurers into regulated providers of universal basic coverage, e.g. very recently in the Netherlands.

aktenlage 7 minutes ago | parent

Thank you.

I think it is important to be (at least a bit) precise in this debate.

I dislike the wording "social contribution", as these are (mandatory) insurances that benefit the insured person in case of sickness, retirement, loss of employment, etc. Discussion about the cost efficiency and fairness of the system are warranted, of course. Anyway, the current generation of retirees benefit greatly from it, so for them at least it was worth paying.

Since you are accounting all those taxes, including the VAT on the citizen's side, companies only pay the Arbeitgeberanteil (you didn't mention) and the taxes on profit?

bbmatryoshka 36 minutes ago | parent

49% of that money goes to taxes

pembrook 19 minutes ago | parent

Sorry, you’re the one who is misguided here.

Government spending as a % of GDP in Germany is exactly 50%. So definitionally half of all money goes to taxes.

Are you counting in VAT on everything OP spends that money on? Are you counting capital gains taxes OP pays when investing that money? Are you counting the taxes paid by the employer for his role (which defacto come out of his pay, just before he gets it)? The property taxes he pays to live?

The employer doesn’t look at the employees salary as the only cost. Employers look at things rationally, using the all-in cost to employ someone (the combined total of all salary and government mandated taxes and benefits contributions). In many European countries this is 2X the persons salary or more.

schnitzelstoat 1 hour ago | parent

The vacation time is genuinely better, yeah.

The universal healthcare is hard to quantify - because most decent companies include health insurance in the US and the quality of the public healthcare provision in Europe can be quite patchy (i.e. location-dependent)

Remember that you are comparing gross salaries too, and taxes are much higher in Germany so the engineer ends up with much less take-home pay.

tw04 55 minutes ago | parent

I hate to break it to you, healthcare in the US is extremely patchy and location dependent.

I can also tell you working in tech for a very long time, if you aren’t working for a Silicon Valley company you might have health insurance options, but that doesn’t mean they’re any good. Especially if you have a preexisting condition.

lotsofpulp 5 minutes ago | parent

>Especially if you have a preexisting condition.

What does this mean?

https://www.healthcare.gov/coverage/pre-existing-conditions/

https://www.hhs.gov/healthcare/about-the-aca/pre-existing-co...

> Health insurance companies cannot refuse coverage or charge you more just because you have a “pre-existing condition” — that is, a health problem you had before the date that new health coverage starts.

>Health insurers can no longer charge more or deny coverage to you or your child because of a pre-existing health condition like asthma, diabetes, or cancer, as well as pregnancy.

>They cannot limit benefits for that condition either. Once you have insurance, they can't refuse to cover treatment for your pre-existing condition.

This has been in effect since 2014 due to the Affordable Care Act.

lionkor 25 minutes ago | parent

That makes it easier to quantify. If I need to work a decent job at a decent company to have good healthcare, then a large number of people don't have good healthcare.

This is not acceptable. Healthcare should be a basic right, and a lot of European countries treat it as such (e.g. in Germany, everyone is insured, no matter their employment status, and its mandatory and equal for everyone regardless of their job).

People also can't be fired for being sick.

legulere 1 hour ago | parent

Median automation engineer in Germany made 78 840 € in 2025, according to government statistics

https://web.arbeitsagentur.de/entgeltatlas/beruf/59351

spiderfarmer 54 minutes ago | parent

Now do per working hour, including benefits.

mstaoru 5 minutes ago | parent

Per working hour would be €157,680.

alberto-m 1 hour ago | parent

The German value seems very suspect. Glassdoor, for the same job role, says €53,000 to €80,000 per year which is probably lower than the truth (Glassdoor overweighs junior roles) but looks much more realistic to me.

sajithdilshan 32 minutes ago | parent

This is such a misconception. There is no such thing as universal healthcare in Germany. Everyone pays for it as a mandatory percentage from their salaries every month as a health insurance fee. You can’t opt out from it and there is a very high barrier to switch to a private health insurance which can be cheaper if you’re young and healthy.

The fucked up part is that the higher your salary you end up paying more money to receive the same service as someone paying way less with a lowers salary. Think of it as one paying 5$ for Netflix and other paying 50$ to watch the same shows with no change in service offering.

Also, since covid times the health service has degraded significantly. You have to wait months to get an appointment for a specialist and also if you are single then you would be the one paying the most for it.

Further, from a 100k salary you take only 58k home (Single person that is Tax class I). Keep in mind 100k salary is not that common in Germany and only a handful of people earn that much. This site calculates the take home salary and taxes/social contributions. (https://www.brutto-netto-rechner.info/gehalt/gross_net_calcu...)

You between 25-30 vacation days and work time can be flexible depending on where you work.

I would say Germany is a good place if you’re married and have kids. Then you get a lot of subsidies from the government and it’s relatively cheap to raise children in Germany. But if you’re young and single, you will be punished for that will be taxed the most.

kuerbel 5 minutes ago | parent

That is not "fucked up" it is called the solidarity principle. You contribute when you have the capacity to contribute, and society protects you when you happen to need more than you can afford. Netflix is a consumer product, and health insurance is risk pooling. You're treating health insurance as if you're buying healthcare services. You're not. You're buying protection against an uncertain financial risk.

Also you forgot the contribution assessment ceiling at €69,750/year.

However, Germany has a legitimate problem when contribution levels, service quality, and access aren't aligned with what people feel they're paying. That is a different discussion which needs much more nuance and intimate knowledge of the German healthcare system.

sajithdilshan 2 minutes ago | parent

The fucked up part is the forced solidarity and high barrier to exit the so called solidarity principle.

stingraycharles 28 minutes ago | parent

It’s really not a disputed fact at all that engineering jobs in the US pay more than in Europe, but that European jobs have more benefits such as vacation and social security, and US generally has higher cost of living.

I am surprised that this suddenly is a “based on what data?” discussion.

It has always been an apples / oranges comparison.

skylurk 48 minutes ago | parent

Globe-trotting contractors are probably well-paid specialists. GP is probably not commenting on the German labor market.

mohamedkoubaa 36 minutes ago | parent

They make less money as salary but aren't cheaper overall when you take into account all the other expenses and regulations.

leoedin 1 hour ago | parent

This is basically how the rest of the world feels with US tech giants.

It's not necessarily a bad thing if there's balance to it. Maybe it's OK if Germans are great at industrial automation and Americans are great at writing word processors. But I'm not sure there's a nice balance to it. Especially if you're in a developing country which is good at neither of those things.

ed_balls 1 hour ago | parent

> The new investment in people is happening in Germany, Poland, Scandinavia

These are shitty job tbh. Friend of a friend worked on designing and testing windscreen wiper motors in Poland. Company did a round of layoffs and there are zero jobs in the country. There is one job in US - nobody will sponsor a visa. He doesn't know the language to work in Asia.

He switched to software.

ghostly_s 1 hour ago | parent

OP made clear they were talking about automation engineers, not test or design jobs.

sleepyguy 58 minutes ago | parent

>What happens when those 2 engineers get sick? or retire? One guy who built half the factory is in his 50s. the line could go down with no backup.

A lifetime of working in mission critical environments taught me one thing. When people leave, nothing happens. People come and go, and everyone is replaceable, even those who believe the company will fail without them. Most departures barely make a ripple. With today's advances in technology, it's only becoming more likely that none of us will be needed down the road.

spiderfarmer 57 minutes ago | parent

Invest in proper education first. The USA has been dropping the ball consistently over the last decades.

groundzeros2015 24 minutes ago | parent

I think we spend about half of state budgets on education actually.

jansan 1 hour ago | parent

The market is definitely there, and Kuka was sold for $4 billion, but whenever venture capitalist are involved, the hype machine is activated and it's difficult to see through the smoke and mirrors.

schmorptron 1 hour ago | parent

Coming right up: Belgian Hybrid shower curtain and defense startup Aperture Science raises 780M Euros, while biotech unicorn Umbrella in on the verge of coming out of stealth and releasing a vaccine for cancer.

sajithdilshan 43 minutes ago | parent

I remember few years ago couple of German fintech startups reached more than 1B$ valuation. Had it been the case in US, those startups would have gone IPOs and started expanding worldwide.

However, raising capital in Europe/Germany is so hard. Still majority of the Germans don’t invest their money and just let it depreciate in their savings accounts. Because of that most startups are funded by US venture capitalists. Hope this one would be able to sustain the valuation

mohamedkoubaa 42 minutes ago | parent

Why exactly is a >1B valuation necessary to expand worldwide?

lionkor 21 minutes ago | parent

> Still majority of the Germans don’t invest their money and just let it depreciate in their savings accounts

Do you have a source on this? I live in Germany and most people I know either invest into stocks (safe, boring ones), invest into a house/apartment/land or similar, or are too broke to even save anything at all (most people).

sajithdilshan 9 minutes ago | parent

Here’s the source( https://www.statista.com/statistics/1365598/stock-ownership-...). In comparison the percentage in US is more than 65%.

You must be interacting with young people because they have started investing after Covid with neobrokers. But the real wealth is with boomer generation and they just let it rot in savings accounts. Maybe things would change once the wealth transfer from boomers to millennials happens

nicman23 43 minutes ago | parent

really putting on the petal to the metal for reaching 2077

MontagFTB 42 minutes ago | parent

I’d like my Pip-Boy in matte black please.

ghostly_s 34 minutes ago | parent

What was that US robotics startup that got tons of press like a decade ago for their "human safe" cobot you were supposed to be able to program by just dragging its arm through the motions? It had a goofy LCD face, I want to say the co. was called US Robotics or something but changed their name, all I’m finding is the modem company though.

fidotron 22 minutes ago | parent

Baxter by Rethink Robotics.