40 points mkornaukhov 5 hours ago 7 comments

js2 1 hour ago | parent

(2016). Previous submissions w/comments:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30623372 (250 points | March 10, 2022 | 27 comments)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22232705 (267 points | Feb 4, 2020 | 29 comments)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15608435 (440 points | Nov 2, 2017 | 53 comments)

ranger_danger 1 hour ago | parent

> I wanted specifically to find a minimal set of restrictions to run untrusted code.

I don't think we should consider containers to be a security boundary. Even full VMs can be escaped, and have been, many times.

The fact that this is possible in the first place makes me think we need a much better approach.

chubot 57 minutes ago | parent

As far as I know, Firecracker, gVisor, and Kata Containers are the solution here. They use VM primitives (x64_64 and ARM64 extensions) and have lighter codebases

https://firecracker-microvm.github.io/

https://gvisor.dev/

https://katacontainers.io/

But I don't have any direct experience with any of them. I'd be curious what people who have built on top of them think

edit: OK it looks like Kata can use Firecracker, so as far as isolation, it's either Firecracker or gVisor. And Firecracker is the VMM I mentioned, but gVisor is quite different -- it's more like a user space kernel that emulates syscalls.

laurencerowe 48 minutes ago | parent

As I understand it Kata supports multiple VMM backends, Firecracker, QEmu, Cloud Hypervisor, and their own Dragonball. Except QEmu, I believe those are all built on crates in the rust-vmm ecosystem, each making slightly different tradeoffs.

binsquare 47 minutes ago | parent

I'm going to toss in smolvm as well because firecracker needs some expertise to make the box usable and secure.

https://github.com/smol-machines/smolvm

raesene9 15 minutes ago | parent

I definitely wouldn't trust standard Linux style containers that expose a shared Linux kernel at the moment, there's been far too many LPE and container breakout vulnerabilities this year. It's possible that in future if the kernel gets a lot more hardened, that could change but things like Firecracker are a better bet from a security standpoint.

setheron 55 minutes ago | parent

I have written https://fzakaria.com/2020/05/31/containers-from-first-princi... a while ago in similar vein.