44 points amai 3 hours ago 66 comments
amai 3 hours ago | parent
ceejayoz 1 hour ago | parent
chasil 1 hour ago | parent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirror-image_life#Potential_ri...
'In December 2024, 38 scientists, including several synthetic biology researchers and two Nobel laureates, warned that the creation of mirror-image life could cause "unprecedented and irreversible harm" to human health and ecosystems worldwide. The reversed structure of mirror-image bacteria could allow them to evade many mechanisms critical for immunity and predation that have evolved to recognize natural-chirality structures. As a result, mirror-image bacteria could potentially escape immune defenses and invade natural ecosystems, leading to "pervasive lethal infections in a substantial fraction of plant and animal species, including humans."'
intrasight 1 hour ago | parent
I don't think preons are technically mirror molecules, but it's close enough from a risk perspective. If rogue AI were to do us in through bioengineering, it might be by creating a novel prion.
rwmj 1 hour ago | parent
chasil 45 minutes ago | parent
Scrapie is incredibly durable in the environment; the prion toxins can remain transmissible in the soil for a decade, causing disease years after it was shed by its previous host.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmissible_spongiform_encep...
dekhn 36 minutes ago | parent
nemomarx 1 hour ago | parent
ceejayoz 1 hour ago | parent
adzm 1 hour ago | parent
Of course there is also the whole potential apocalypse scenario
xyzal 1 hour ago | parent
nativeit 1 hour ago | parent
Potential applications of mirror-image molecules include:
Enantiopure drugs: Some pharmaceuticals show different activity depending on enantiomeric form.
L-ribonucleic acid aptamers: Artificial oligonucleotides that are constructed from the mirror-image versions of their natural forms. L-RNA aptamers are highly resistant to degradation by nucleases and are currently being tested in clinical trials.
L-glucose, enantiomer of standard glucose: Tests showed that it tastes likes standard sugar, but is not metabolized the same way. However, it was never marketed due to excessive manufacturing costs. More recent research allows cheap production with high yields; however the authors state that it is not usable as a sweetener due to laxative effects.
aatd86 1 hour ago | parent
functionmouse 1 hour ago | parent
umvi 1 hour ago | parent
gs17 43 minutes ago | parent
hobo123 17 minutes ago | parent
umvi 15 minutes ago | parent
nemomarx 11 minutes ago | parent
I do worry that much mass not being digested would be trouble for you though.
tracerbulletx 1 hour ago | parent
boesboes 1 hour ago | parent
embedding-shape 1 hour ago | parent
AnimalMuppet 1 hour ago | parent
I worked for this company that did telephone service for the hard of hearing. It was a phone that could go very loud. It also captioned the far end of the phone call, in case the user couldn't pick out all the words, even with the high volume.
I await your world-ending scenario for that tech and/or company.
peddling-brink 1 hour ago | parent
Dolphins are advanced enough, we should let them take it from here.
Almondsetat 1 hour ago | parent
vconnor 1 hour ago | parent
Ironically, this is the type of mindset of scientists that do this type of dangerous research. Just to see if it’s possible, with no concern of ethics ever bothering them.
voganmother42 47 minutes ago | parent
You thought you were enabling communication(already dangerous as per the babel fish!) but you were ensuring the means of transmission!
But seriously though, sounds like a fun job where the byproduct of your work improved the experiences and access of people, and thats pretty great.
trimethylpurine 37 minutes ago | parent
And in all cases your salary will be taxed to fund weapons and warfare no matter what work you're doing.
Your fingers alone can kill. Everything is a weapon. Don't ignore that fact. Seek to empower the evil doer that is doing the least evil. Do gooders don't run for office.
hackeraccount 17 minutes ago | parent
amelius 1 hour ago | parent
RobotToaster 30 minutes ago | parent
mrlonglong 1 hour ago | parent
api 1 hour ago | parent
All I hear is "there's no danger" or "OMG this will kill us all" and in neither case is any reason given.
vouaobrasil 1 hour ago | parent
1. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.ads9158?referrer...
2. https://www.sciencefocus.com/nature/mirror-life-experiment-d...
The detailed thinking has been published in high-ranking journals like Science. And even if the risk is relatively small, isn't that already a good enough reason not to cross this border. Do we have to fucking discover everything? Don't we have enough already?
The craziness of some people who want to know everything is beyond my comprehension.
captainbland 1 hour ago | parent
ishouldnotbutk8 38 minutes ago | parent
Isn't that the point of science? To discover things? I don't think we know enough already.
Now should we pursue this specific dangerous research direction? Probably not. But I don't think broad statements like "we have enough already" are warranted.
phkahler 38 minutes ago | parent
api 26 minutes ago | parent
Perform a series of primary safety experiments on board, determining whether mirror life truly does evade immune systems, predation, decomposition, or other biological check mechanisms.
If the safety experiment results are alarming, the spacecraft is not just far past Earth but has a powerful explosive on board and can be detonated in deep space. Any living matter scattered by the explosion would be destroyed by solar and cosmic rays, and it's not coming back to Earth anyway.
A maybe cheaper but slightly less intensively confined solution would be to do it deep underground with a tactical nuke on hand to turn the results into radioactive ash encased in bedrock if the results are alarming.
I think we should do this, since it's obvious that the technology to create mirror life exists. If it is existentially dangerous we should find out under highly isolated conditions. If it's not we can breathe a sigh of relief, and if it is we can take appropriate regulatory action before someone oops-es it.
sscaryterry 1 hour ago | parent
ceejayoz 37 minutes ago | parent
If both sided life was prevalent early on, and one outcompeted the other, it may have gone extinct a billion years back. New life would have some difficulty evolving in an environment where existing life is well established.
unddoch 1 hour ago | parent
tim-star 1 hour ago | parent
more seriously: how would it be able search for something it has no experience seeing at all
dekhn 27 minutes ago | parent
In one example, the mirror molecules would likely cause some sort of localized inflammation or other lesion, and then the immune system would be attracted to the area, generating trillions of combinations of randomized protein sequences. If within that trillion there is just 1 antibody that can bind to the mirror life, the immune system will duplicate that molecule many times, and they will bind to the mirror molecules, recruit other proteins that will isolate and degrade them, and then remove them from the body.
Due to the complexity of protein structures, antibodies can bind to mirror molecules.
Every time I show a computer scientist this system: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V(D)J_recombination they remark, "Wait, nature uses self-modifying code? It generates trillions of random combinations, shuffles them around, finding the best ones, and then amplifies them? You know that sort of sounds like this CS technique called genetic algorithms" at which point you just stare at them until the exclamation point above their head goes "BINGO"
Traubenfuchs 45 minutes ago | parent
With perfect knowledge of the immune system and the capability to create the pathogens of our dreams it would most likely be possible to create this pathogen of our dreams.
Making an entire self replicating mirror organism that would both have this property of "being invisible to the specific immune system" and AND being an effective pathogen is far from a solved problem though. It's further away as useful quantum computing!
We don't even have self replicating mirror cells, just some synthetic Frankensteins.
dekhn 23 minutes ago | parent
scotty79 1 hour ago | parent
To get mirror substances you need to create them chemically which is PITA even if possible.
I highly recommend watching an interview with a person that achieved best results so far with creating artificial normal (for some definitions of normal) almost life from the grounds up.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4WywVQfIV4
There is a section of whether this kind of work enables creation mirror life as well.
vinni2 1 hour ago | parent
sir_eliah 1 hour ago | parent
- "Starfish"
- "Maelstrom"
- "βehemoth"
aeve890 1 hour ago | parent
How I read that? Like Ssehemoth or like Behemoth?
sir_eliah 1 hour ago | parent
In [1]: ord("β")
Out[1]: 946
In [2]: ord("ß")
Out[2]: 223aeve890 53 minutes ago | parent
AndrewKemendo 19 minutes ago | parent
andrewshadura 8 minutes ago | parent
dekhn 38 minutes ago | parent
vouaobrasil 1 hour ago | parent
Obviously not worth it, but to the person who themselves face an existential risk, the level of absurd justification from the instinct to survive will always trump sanity.
aqme28 33 minutes ago | parent
Or to make a couple of bucks. Reading that mirror-image sugars could work as calorie-free sweeteners feels like foreshadowing for the end of the world.
ale42 5 minutes ago | parent
otikik 57 minutes ago | parent
vulture916 53 minutes ago | parent
In my world, that'd be illegal.
MadrasTh0rn 51 minutes ago | parent
veexx103 46 minutes ago | parent
ForHackernews 18 minutes ago | parent