116 points TechTechTech 1 hour ago 114 comments
rbanffy 1 hour ago | parent
HackerThemAll 1 hour ago | parent
epgui 1 hour ago | parent
resters 1 hour ago | parent
jimbokun 46 minutes ago | parent
Even they have their limits.
wg0 1 hour ago | parent
actionfromafar 1 hour ago | parent
jimbokun 46 minutes ago | parent
monocasa 43 minutes ago | parent
cromka 1 hour ago | parent
Wow, so tough, much decision
noitpmeder 1 hour ago | parent
bflesch 1 hour ago | parent
vrganj 1 hour ago | parent
actionfromafar 1 hour ago | parent
medina 1 hour ago | parent
jeroenhd 48 minutes ago | parent
But now it just happens to be that their president didn't get the Nobel peace price. The person who did was a judge on the ICC.
It could be a complete coincidence, of course. I mean, if it isn't, it would reinforce the notion of the USA being a clown of a country, which I'm sure Americans would prevent.
resters 1 hour ago | parent
I suspect this one was actually meant as a joke, although it is not remotely funny in my opinion.
Someone in Trump's orbit who writes them gets an immature charge out of trolling people.
So far my prediction about Trump have sadly been correct: The US is getting weaker and poorer every day.
jimbokun 49 minutes ago | parent
curiousllama 48 minutes ago | parent
Is this a legitimate policy decision? Maybe - but it sure reads like the ranting of a drunk.
b5n 33 minutes ago | parent
"They're trolling" is simply a juvenile defense that provides the cult and its members with plausible deniability.
The world might be slightly better off if we'd all taken them seriously from the start, but taking clowns and the accompanying circus seriously is unintuitive to most.
vrganj 1 hour ago | parent
Another match lighting US soft power on fire
The last round of ICC sanctions got everyone here talking about tech sovereignty, now France and Germany are rolling their own productivity suites, the Netherlands are rolling their own NixOS distro, etc etc.
This is just going to further hurt US interests. Biting the hand that feeds, burning down their own empire out of hubris. And Americans voted for this! Twice!
It's time the EU rolls out the Blocking Statute [0] to counteract this nonsense.
[0] https://finance.ec.europa.eu/eu-and-world/open-strategic-aut...
actionfromafar 1 hour ago | parent
So, good news I guess. Everything is fine. Trump is the best president ever in the history of the world.
conmod278 56 minutes ago | parent
BoggleOhYeah 42 minutes ago | parent
DFHippie 8 minutes ago | parent
For many Americans, three times!
And for many Americans, never.
Also, bear in mind that the first time he won he lost the popular vote by 2.1 percentage points. We have a voting system that favors less populous states. In 2024 he won the popular vote by 1.5 percentage points. He has never been very popular in this country. But his party controls all branches of government and he controls his party.
It turns out electing a stupid, vengeful narcissist and liar who is at death's door is not the way to go.
yzydserd 1 hour ago | parent
maratc 56 minutes ago | parent
monocasa 46 minutes ago | parent
Which is all the ICC can do to nations that aren't signatories to the Rome statute.
maratc 34 minutes ago | parent
It's not crazy to think that I won't be served meat if I'm going to a house of a vegetarian. It is however crazy to think that I will be stoned in that house for having eaten meat in the past.
zarzavat 32 minutes ago | parent
sdcfgy 1 hour ago | parent
rfgplk 1 hour ago | parent
mfost 59 minutes ago | parent
vrganj 59 minutes ago | parent
Why should we believe in the fantasy of the nation state, but not in the fantasy of international law? It's all just social constructs to create an ordered society that stops the worst excesses.
a_paddy 58 minutes ago | parent
sdcfgy 56 minutes ago | parent
That is authority if you like it or not.
wilg 55 minutes ago | parent
jcranmer 55 minutes ago | parent
chmod775 52 minutes ago | parent
Saying that they don't have authority to make a decision implies that there's some universal set of rules that internationally lays down what anyone's authority is - precisely the kind of thing you appear to be opposed to, because such a set of rules would likely need a court!
sobellian 51 minutes ago | parent
You seem to have arrived at a suitable definition of "authority"
chmod775 31 minutes ago | parent
sobellian 22 minutes ago | parent
chmod775 21 minutes ago | parent
sobellian 16 minutes ago | parent
chmod775 12 minutes ago | parent
onedognight 43 minutes ago | parent
dmitrygr 41 minutes ago | parent
Refresh my memory, what did USA choose about that?
vrganj 36 minutes ago | parent
Rules for thee, not for me.
alexgieg 24 minutes ago | parent
If you equate what the Presidents of the USA want to what the USA itself wants, then the USA have decided they don't want that.
If not, then you'd need to organize a referendum and let the population itself decide on a one person, one vote basis.
chasil 32 minutes ago | parent
The U.S., along with China, India, Russia, and many other nations, are not members and do not grant any weight to ICC rulings.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Criminal_Court#C...
DFHippie 52 minutes ago | parent
sdcfgy 50 minutes ago | parent
(I am from the country that voted to leave the EU...)
shagie 33 minutes ago | parent
Sometimes it can be learned with a simple first degree burn. Sometimes you get blisters. Sometimes the government in power is determined to hold their hand to it and get third degree burns.
Hopefully the pain from this round of burns can be remembered for a while longer before its repeated again.
DFHippie 23 minutes ago | parent
sparklysoup 16 minutes ago | parent
jimbokun 52 minutes ago | parent
Pretty sure even a lot of the current President's voters are slowly coming to this same realization. I predict soon in casual conversation almost no one will have voted for this man.
mattcaldwell 40 minutes ago | parent
ogogmad 38 minutes ago | parent
jmcqk6 8 minutes ago | parent
There is no way this is happening. The logistics alone will be killer and as bad as things are, there is nothing that would be gained by this that would be worth the pain it would cause.
To the extent that there are geographic differences, it is not between red states and blue states, but rural vs. urban. Even in texas the major cities almost all go blue.
jimbokun 34 minutes ago | parent
altruios 6 minutes ago | parent
"Democrats eat babies, are Satanist, globalists, shadow-government elite that trump is saving us from!": said the Coin Dealer.
I wish I was doing hyperbole... I really wish that I was...
jolux 41 minutes ago | parent
actionfromafar 33 minutes ago | parent
sdcfgy 14 minutes ago | parent
Bridges are burned that will never be rebuilt.
tiahura 39 minutes ago | parent
nextaccountic 28 minutes ago | parent
There's an US law that says the US will invade Belgium if the court wanted to investigate an American (???)
I remember Hillary Clinton, in the Obama administration, saying the US is an exceptional country that deserves exceptional conditions regarding this issue
It's frankly ridiculous
matheusmoreira 9 minutes ago | parent
Pretty wild that the US has a law that literally says it must invade another country if they judge Americans for war crimes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Service-Members%27_Pr...
bijowo1676 26 minutes ago | parent
simpaticoder 25 minutes ago | parent
The root of the problem is in the collective mind of Americans. We are the problem - we've been hacked to be both stupid and proud of that stupidity, to cease recognizing "character" or "virtue" as a signal, to cease caring about reality that doesn't support opinions that were installed on us, like malware, or anything really except entertainment. Because that's the ONE thing we do get out of all this - we get to be entertained. How funny when he says outlandish things like immigrants are eating the cats, eating the dogs! How hilarious (and macho!) when he brags about grabbing women. How wonderful it is to see the discomfiture of the libs when he parrots Nazi propaganda or when he encouraged the Proud Boys to storm the capital to overturn his loss, and then his lackeys claimed it either didn't happen or was a false flag. "Hang Mike Pence!" is what an obese, fentanyl- and TikTok-addicted mind thinks is doing something! And hey, you can say "retard" again without getting canceled.
I've got kids and I'm terrified for them.
pluc 21 minutes ago | parent
medina 1 hour ago | parent
aatd86 30 minutes ago | parent
pluc 1 hour ago | parent
curiousllama 59 minutes ago | parent
The proximal cause of the sanctions appears to be that the Nobel Peace Prize was won by a former ICC judge, and Trump covets it.
The distal cause is that the US never joined the ICC, arguing that US political & military leaders should not be subject to a binding foreign jurisdiction. This is a longstanding disagreement, with bipartisan consensus in DC.
Putting pressure on this disagreement, the ICC has a warrants out for Netanyahu and others that the current administration views as a political & military ally.
My interpretation is basically: this is a petty move about the Nobel, which builds on a long-simmering disagreement about the role of international law.
https://apnews.com/article/us-icc-trump-rubio-4ea3555403e3c6... https://www.reuters.com/world/us-imposes-sanctions-internati...
bediger4000 43 minutes ago | parent
Previous bipartisan consensus thus means nothing. Bipartisan consensus now means everyone capitulated to Trump's whim of the day.
curiousllama 37 minutes ago | parent
It is indeed fragile since, as you point out, it only takes one party (or in Rs case, one person) to eliminate the consensus. Consensus comes and goes.
And yet, it's notable when through the chaos, both parties have consistently maintained lockstep agreement for 30 years.
fedeb95 18 minutes ago | parent
WhyNotHugo 57 minutes ago | parent
Do these sanctions also affect anyone working at the ICC?
curiousllama 51 minutes ago | parent
E.g., the ICC ditched Microsoft last year, likely foreseeing this type of action.
https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1ommt2f/the_int...
dghughes 8 minutes ago | parent
https://www.npr.org/2026/10/01/nx-s1-5977815/trump-icc-sanct...
"You start to lose services from American companies, Amazon, Google, potentially Apple, whatever it may be," she told Morning Edition. "Completely randomly, though, you don't know when something's going to happen."
One of those moments came during an ordinary moment at home.
"I went home and Alexa wouldn't talk to me," she told NPR's Steve Inskeep.
Her credit cards, issued in the Netherlands and Canada, were canceled. She has managed to keep some bank accounts, but says her banking services are extremely limited and even small transfers can be blocked.
pu_pe 51 minutes ago | parent
1a527dd5 51 minutes ago | parent
qarl 46 minutes ago | parent
Regardless - I think it's safe to assume this isn't happening in a vacuum - there are a number of world players who profit from the collapse of the U.S. And all this trouble started the moment they could use the internet to feed stupid Americans their stupid propaganda.
DFHippie 18 minutes ago | parent
tiahura 38 minutes ago | parent
hypfer 48 minutes ago | parent
Not a week passes without the US giving other nations very good reasons to cut out any dependencies on anything under their jurisdiction.
Is California now panicking and exiting the United states? That would be really funny.
mendym 44 minutes ago | parent
_ache_ 34 minutes ago | parent
SillyUsername 43 minutes ago | parent
See the similarity here...?
franczesko 38 minutes ago | parent
ChrisArchitect 33 minutes ago | parent
hexis 30 minutes ago | parent
socializer 29 minutes ago | parent
Now, as it happens, the US is one of the most economically and militarily powerful states out there, so they're the closest we have to an actual world police - but again, that police doesn't follow "international law", they act in what they think is the best interest of the West (or the US specifically). That's how all regional powers roll, albeit on a smaller scale. Russia and China make claims to neighboring states, Germany unceremoniously protects its economic interests in the EU, Iran bankrolls terrorists in neighboring states who in turn bomb Iran, and so on.
The ICC is a bit unusual in that it's an initiative of some Western states trying to get the most powerful state to play by their rules. It's a nice try, but also... obviously doomed? And it's not something the US can ignore, because the court does assert the authority to arrest and try US servicemen and politicians. So this was kinda inevitable, and if you think the sanctions are bad, consider the bipartisan Hague Invasion Act of 2002: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Service-Members%27_Pr...
fedeb95 20 minutes ago | parent
One can also argue that, exactly because there is the right to self-determination, there is a huge need for a inter-national and super-national organism to ensure that a right of some country doesn't jeopardise the rights of others.
Is the ICC the right organism? Maybe, maybe not; we can argue about that.
rich_sasha 7 minutes ago | parent
Which is a long way of saying, there’s a consensus that there are standards higher than national law we may want to uphold.
I know ICC is later, and also US never joined, in a somewhat hypocritical compromise. But at least the purpose and motivation, IMO, are clean and noble.
notrealyme123 23 minutes ago | parent
Are the ICC already terrorists, or not yet? Asking for a friend who doesn't want to get bombed.
reactordev 7 minutes ago | parent