191 points rooftopzen 1 hour ago 77 comments
sznio 1 hour ago | parent
Dkuku 1 hour ago | parent
maelito 1 hour ago | parent
meowface 42 minutes ago | parent
Reminds me of when 4channers said 4chan's daily interracial posting went way down on October 7, 2023. (It didn't.)
I could believe this, but not before I see a good empirical analysis. Until then, it just feels like typical folk gossip.
Eji1700 36 minutes ago | parent
People have been problematic since recorded time, and the whole "well X% of internet traffic is bots!" doesn't mean the % you're interacting with is just that.
99.99% (totally made up for example) of the emails I am probably sent are spam, those are filtered automatically before I even see them by the various email providers, and of the remaining .01% some still slips through.
I feel that there's somewhat of a similar disconnect between "x amount of traffic is bots" and people assuming that means that supposed ally who says horrible things is a bot (...or psyop..or false flag...or etc...)
parineum 30 minutes ago | parent
conception 32 minutes ago | parent
Eg https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328006677_Weaponizi...
This is an easy topic to find empirical analysis.
meowface 23 minutes ago | parent
ikt 18 minutes ago | parent
yet to see any evidence of anything else going down
Zanfa 27 minutes ago | parent
[0] https://edmo.eu/publications/how-covid-19-conspiracy-theoris...
Geof25 38 minutes ago | parent
ericmay 33 minutes ago | parent
CursedSilicon 30 minutes ago | parent
UK? Quite possibly. Given their recent admission (finally) around the Russian propaganda for Brexit
throw93038300 24 minutes ago | parent
UK has no infra to target even their own missiles. They always had to use US!
bluegatty 23 minutes ago | parent
ruperthair 20 minutes ago | parent
riffraff 14 minutes ago | parent
I mean, sure, maybe some random person at the Pentagon could have done it but the US has not acted as a Ukraine ally for years now.
tonyedgecombe 6 minutes ago | parent
tonyedgecombe 9 minutes ago | parent
vjk800 28 minutes ago | parent
There's of course the obvious, low effort trolling, but I'd think there are also more subtle, maybe more intellectually equipped information warfare going on.
EmilStraad 13 minutes ago | parent
mr_mitm 4 minutes ago | parent
[1] https://www.dkriesel.com/_media/sonntagsfrage_wahl2025.png
baxtr 12 minutes ago | parent
komali2 1 hour ago | parent
It makes me wonder whether activists should have been targeting these operations sooner. I had no idea they were so centralized.
rooftopzen 1 hour ago | parent
jmward01 1 hour ago | parent
anigbrowl 1 hour ago | parent
jojobas 1 hour ago | parent
Jean-Papoulos 38 minutes ago | parent
accountrequired 25 minutes ago | parent
mr_mitm 21 minutes ago | parent
jdw64 1 hour ago | parent
Robdel12 50 minutes ago | parent
Something like https://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-military-laser-shoots-down-c...
jdw64 50 minutes ago | parent
cyberax 4 minutes ago | parent
So lasers or turrets can work if you want to defend a military base in the middle of a desert, but not something that can be deployed in cities.
Apparently, the most efficient method so far is interceptor drones.
vkou 23 minutes ago | parent
They aren't fundamentally different from a hundreds of assholes sitting in an airplane 25,000 feet above you, flying above the ceiling of your flak and air interceptors, dropping a few thousand tons of firebombs on your town.
> I'm curious about how to defend against such drones.
Looking at what most of their targets have in common, I'd say that there's an easy answer to that - don't start wars.
ron_k 1 hour ago | parent
xvxvx 1 hour ago | parent
toxik 1 hour ago | parent
swarnie 54 minutes ago | parent
Previously we can point to data and see things like Scotland Independence accounts all go quite on mass when Iran goes offline, or the OSRS player base go down and the gold price spike when Venezuela has a blackout.
I've seen no analysis connecting Yandex's sabotage to a drop in hate speech on the English speaking internet.
input_sh 8 minutes ago | parent
We genuinely have nothing but vibes now, as we have like 4 social media sites that have collectively decided to severely limit their APIs or straight up kill research-focused tools (like Facebook's own CrowdTangle) around 2023-2024.
jadamson 47 minutes ago | parent
podocarp 45 minutes ago | parent
lsofzz 1 hour ago | parent
Yandex is just a drop in the ocean bud.
simondotau 26 minutes ago | parent
No serious person would ever claim that Russian cyber influence operations were sending traffic directly from Russian IP addresses. That's 'Get Smart' levels of absurdity. It's as ridiculous as a Russian spy pretending to be an American while speaking with a thick Russian accent.
RamblingCTO 16 minutes ago | parent
gritzko 1 hour ago | parent
The interesting aspect is this: Yandex was taken from its owners semi-consensually. Similarly, the original owner of the troll farms was blown up in a business jet. He staged a mutiny cause his dirty bloody business was about to be taken from him non-consensually. Some other large non-consensual takeovers unfold for 5 years, soon 6.
What an appetite!
alterom 20 minutes ago | parent
Yevheniy Prigozhin, of Wagner PMC fame lately (and ultimately):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yevgeny_Prigozhin
> Not sure if troll farms got affected in any way, that is a different business entirely, no overlap.
Was a different business. Before the "consensual" takeover.
After the takeover, there's only one business that matters: do what they tell you.
nomilk 48 minutes ago | parent
Many are (incorrectly) interpreting 'bot traffic' to mean something like "fake users on social media that leave comments and 'likes' supporting right-wing posts". (something Russian bots were accused of during the 2016 US presidential election)
But Yandex is like Russia's Google. Both Google and Yandex need to scrape the internet in order to index (no indexing means the site would not appear in search results).
So Yandex datacenters going down meant so too did their 'bots' that visit sites to index them. Nothing to do with 'bots' as per the Russia collusion allegations a la the 2016 election.
cluckindan 31 minutes ago | parent
foltik 22 minutes ago | parent
f311a 20 minutes ago | parent
mr_mitm 19 minutes ago | parent
fouc 11 minutes ago | parent
makerofthings 42 minutes ago | parent
INTPenis 10 minutes ago | parent
atmosx 3 minutes ago | parent
victorbjorklund 40 minutes ago | parent
deanc 31 minutes ago | parent
john_minsk 27 minutes ago | parent
wraptile 7 minutes ago | parent
My guess would be that there will be a significant change detected but Russian troll farms are not totally datacenter operated - it's still mostly ran by real office workers like in 1984. That being said, you still need datacenter compute for organizing even manual operations like this.
asdf88990 9 minutes ago | parent
Yes, russia uses both farms and attempts to influence the public opinion, but guess what.
SXX 7 minutes ago | parent
This is just not how social media botting works. If you try to "bot" facebook, instagram or any major social network via browser from datacenter IP let alone ones from Russia you'll soon get all your accounts banned.
Social media are botted via apps on mobile phones set in large farms; read: thousands of mobile devices. They either jailbroken or have some advance automation.
Neither they use Russian IP. Instead they go for residential proxies kindly provided by Israeli firms where bandwidth cost a leg, but it worth it. Or they just use their own botnets instead.