21 points qwertox 2 hours ago 17 comments

klinch 47 minutes ago | parent

Man, I wish there were some pictures. I didn’t even know that there are LTE modems that small.

TacticalCoder 43 minutes ago | parent

There are pictures online. And for an unexplainable reason it is the person behind the biggest Bitcoin exchange SNAFU of all times (where hackers stole something like 800 000 Bitcoins), Mark Karpeles of "Mt. Gox" (who did jail time btw), who was the first to post them:

Apparently the hacker did remove the battery and replace it with a smaller one, leaving enough room for the tiny eSIM/LTE modem / OCR chip that did recognition of the secret on screen.

kotaKat 33 minutes ago | parent

Aboutplants 25 minutes ago | parent

What incredible engineering

TacticalCoder 47 minutes ago | parent

I already commented the other day on this exploit but really it's fascinating.

I don't care about cryptocurrencies but I've always been fascinated by the cryptography behind it. I've also dabbled with hardware wallets for non-cryptocurrencies stuff: like U2F auth.

The idea of a master secret that is behind a secure element which I control and which I can duplicate is amazing to me (as opposed to, say, "your" passkeys which Google/Microsoft/Apple can basically backup and transfer to other devices for you).

But really to me in the cryptocurrencies world people have been sold the lie that a hardware wallet was secure: it's not. It could be tampered with (as happened in this hack, where an additional rogue chip reading the screen and then sending it using an eSIM steals the secret) but it can also contain a bug (like the recent Coldcard exploit where Coldcard hardware wallets fell back on a RNG with only 32 bits of entropy and some dark-hat hacker cracked those and stole Bitcoins) and, most of all, the vendor of the hardware wallet itself can do nasty attacks (like "kleptography").

From the very start everybody in the ecosystem should have pushed of "n-of-n" schemes (say even just 2-of-2), where one secret goes on a hardware wallet from one vendor and the other secret goes on a hardware wallet from another vendor.

For years and years the tune has been: "PCs cannot be trusted, use a hardware wallet" but it mislead people.

PCs indeed cannot be trusted but unsuspecting users should have learned how to use 2-of-2 or 3-of-3 schemes, to become immune from hacks affecting one hardware wallet vendor.

The typical, non-sensical, response to this is the idiotic: "but if you have two secrets, if you lose one of them you lose everything". It's totally idiotic for people basically save a list of 24 words (the "seed", which is the master secret). Well, guess what: instead of saving a list of 24 words, you save a list of 48 words. Exact same thing, just twice longer.

That's my take: the entire "your coins will be safe if you use a hardware wallet" was misguided.

knorker 40 minutes ago | parent

If you lie down with dogs, you will get up with fleas.

Dogs = cryptocurrencies. Fleas = scammed.

JKCalhoun 15 minutes ago | parent

Yep. Crypto is more clever than I am—and there are scammers in the field equally so.

(My hardware wallet is made of pleather and holds paper bills.)

birdsongs 37 minutes ago | parent

Garbage website that doesn't allow me to reject tracking cookies without paying.

> Data processing by advertising providers including personalised advertising with profiling

> Consent [required for free use]

curiousObject 33 minutes ago | parent

Here’s a new market for $500 Faraday Cages, if any HN readers are interested in selling that

jacquesm 33 minutes ago | parent

The link you want:

https://grandideastudio.com/portfolio/security/ledger-hardwa...

They should have posted the weight with and without the device in it.

Also: never leave empty space in a hardware key, pot the whole thing in epoxy.

flibble 27 minutes ago | parent

I heard they reduced the battery size to make space for their chip.

jacquesm 10 minutes ago | parent

Yes, hence the potting. You'd have to figure out a way to open the device without breaking it.

samlinnfer 22 minutes ago | parent

jacquesm 12 minutes ago | parent

Ah good one, more useful info in that one. That kapton circuit might be traceable to whoever ordered it.

curiousObject 7 minutes ago | parent

And the Vodafone NL SIM could also offer some leads