65 points speckx 1 hour ago 24 comments
comrade1234 1 hour ago | parent
yborg 48 minutes ago | parent
queenkjuul 44 minutes ago | parent
serf 35 minutes ago | parent
let's all join a private tracker!
that'll fix the problem, the bad actors won't chase the crowd, and it definitely wont end in a burning of the library of alexandria loss-of-history what.cd style event again and again if the public can't archive it.
/s
how about we just create an exe/bat/com exclusion on our dumb-as-dick media downloaders like sensible people have been doing for 30+ years?
c-hendricks 11 minutes ago | parent
Using settings on the indexer isn't great since with Prowlarr the user doesn't actually interact with the indexer portion of Sonarr.
Doing it in release profiles by bumping down their score is a cute workaround but then the torrents will just stop saying ".exe" in their title.
Really it's a thing Sonarr have to do, as evidenced by the multiple PRs they have to try and finally do it.
shmoil 1 hour ago | parent
gradstudent 38 minutes ago | parent
torben-friis 28 minutes ago | parent
In practice, it's just adding an API key, setting a rule in the app to remove after x and then you can go back to ignoring it.
SSLy 21 minutes ago | parent
lelandfe 21 minutes ago | parent
TBF this isn’t a revival of some 90s thing, this is just how private trackers have been. What was the same in the aughts, for instance.
joloooo 1 hour ago | parent
redrove 57 minutes ago | parent
I’m as upset as OP, get a job skid.
bhaney 41 minutes ago | parent
Havoc 1 hour ago | parent
The whole sticky notes next to monitor is not a joke. I bet you could grab some crypto recovery keys this way
dd_xplore 59 minutes ago | parent
hparadiz 52 minutes ago | parent
bhaney 44 minutes ago | parent
Alternatively, if there's a way to have qbit itself mark the download as "Failed" when it detects and refuses to download an executable, that would work too. I don't use qbit personally so I don't know if that's a thing it can be configured to do.
riley_dog 43 minutes ago | parent
para_parolu 43 minutes ago | parent
stronglikedan 32 minutes ago | parent
hoppp 37 minutes ago | parent
LoganDark 10 minutes ago | parent
The ability to change it, dude. Have you never written a malware before?
Often a primary concern is the security response, so you want redundancy and the ability to work around enforcement action, such as website takedowns.
> And to whoever made this: you probably spent weeks or shit ton of tokens on ChaCha20, AES-CTR, runtime API hashing, anti sandbox scoring, Chrome app bound encryption bypasses, just to make a shitty skid malware.
People have been making infostealers that support hundreds or thousands of different apps and corners of your computer for decades. Plenty of vendors pride themselves on it.
bastard_op 9 minutes ago | parent
Scammers always have a new trick up their sleeve.
josu 3 minutes ago | parent
egberts1 1 minute ago | parent