53 points teekert 1 hour ago 15 comments
klappgrt 42 minutes ago | parent
terabytest 39 minutes ago | parent
Roxo 38 minutes ago | parent
Tryvrsakjo10 30 minutes ago | parent
thatsabadlook 18 minutes ago | parent
Our now former allies aren't making this public to smear some guy they met at a party they don't like. They are warning the world that the us is an oligarchy and rule of law is dead.
KaiserPro 19 minutes ago | parent
If he's telling the truth, then I would do the same.
If he's lying, then it might work, I would also probably do the same.
The interesting thing here is that two publications allowed the journalist to call Kushner "corrupt". This means that the lawyers would have seen compelling evidence that would mean one of two things:
1) Kushner wouldn't take them to court, because he would have to settle out of court in an expensive way
2) Kushner, if he were to take court action, would not win civil case.
This leads me to think that there is more than a shred of evidence, but an awful lot of evidence that he didn't declare what he was supposed to (at best) and at worse laundered foreign cash for his own purposes
thatsabadlook 17 minutes ago | parent
amelius 31 minutes ago | parent
233mhz 9 minutes ago | parent
TrackerFF 5 minutes ago | parent
In any case, Kushner - and rightfully so - could not obtain a security clearance the first time around, due to massive debt. But it was overruled / waived by higher ups.
I've worked in intel, and Kushner seems like the textbook example - a cautionary tale - on the type of person you do not want to grant anything of importance.
Honestly it sort of blows my mind that the US has a system decisions by security professionals can simply be overruled.
nxobject 4 minutes ago | parent
dzogchen 2 minutes ago | parent