87 points noplay 2 hours ago 75 comments
goodcake3963 1 hour ago | parent
vachina 1 hour ago | parent
pasc1878 1 hour ago | parent
https://www.panamericandispatch.org/p/meta-ignores-brazilian...
drstewart 1 hour ago | parent
pjc50 1 hour ago | parent
ButlerianJihad 1 hour ago | parent
mosura 1 hour ago | parent
shevy-java 1 hour ago | parent
I am all for eliminating the antisocial media and the billionaires behind them as well, but I fail to see how censorship fixes anything.
wtch98 1 hour ago | parent
aziaziazi 50 minutes ago | parent
MajorTakeaway 19 minutes ago | parent
maxwellito 1 hour ago | parent
Zenul_Abidin 1 hour ago | parent
Good luck France.
You'd think a 1st world country would know about VPNs but not this one
grodriguez100 1 hour ago | parent
archargelod 1 hour ago | parent
spwa4 47 minutes ago | parent
Of course reasons to block websites has expanded dramatically, especially into the political realm. For political examples, websites collecting video evidence police actions during protests "Copwatch Nord Paris I-D-F", a lot of extreme-right websites (some arguably not very extreme, or should I say, every year that passes the bar of what means extreme-right for blocking purposes is lowered), VPNs, oh and "right-to-be-forgotten" stuff (blocking a number of groups who published details on important French and EU political figures, generally failing to achieve their goal. For a high profile example, ex-president Nicolas Sarkozy used internet censorship to hide evidence of fraud, but got convicted anyway. There's also the example of ... I don't like to agree with the extreme right on anything, BUT, it is sadly absolutely true that LFI (a far left political party, or whatever you want to call leftists that, while absolutely not tankies, are not particularly opposed to using violence to achieve their aims. I think that's fair to say about them) is using internet censorship laws for everything from protecting their members against the police to silencing even internal criticism. Of course it is ALSO true RN commits far more problematic violence)
(obviously the reason LFI wants its members protected from the police, and school administrations and ... is the organizing violence thing they do. A lot of people agree at least with the aims of the protests, and it's not like these people commit murder or anything. But they certainly do cause a lot of destruction of property)
embedding-shape 1 hour ago | parent
Probably, since not many of us in Europe don't have lots of use cases for them, yet.
But things like our (Spain's) "internet shall not be 100% available during La Liga football matches" or our neighbors thinking of blocking DNS to stop political activism, surely will continue to make this number raise, albeit slowly.
kaonwarb 1 hour ago | parent
throw9393793 1 hour ago | parent
latexr 1 hour ago | parent
aziaziazi 57 minutes ago | parent
elashri 43 minutes ago | parent
hinoki 31 minutes ago | parent
jeroenhd 1 hour ago | parent
And yes, you can in theory install the same software used to punch through the Chinese firewall, but if it doesn't appear in the app store or google play, your new VPN is as good as dead.
There are no technical solutions to political and social problems.
hdgvhicv 25 minutes ago | parent
mosura 1 hour ago | parent
Parfait.
sjdh76 1 hour ago | parent
Cuz Claude Shannon told us if everyone broadcasts on the same frequency noise increases and no one hears anything forcing them into broadcasting at higher and higher power or repeating their messages more and more. Which again increases noise. So Broadcasting has always been licensed and regulated. That solved the Noise problem because people were forced to coordinate use of broadcast spectrum.
Social media platforms act as if Shannon doesn't apply. So they do exactly what Shannon predicted. Everyone is broadcasting. No one can be heard clearly. People scream louder and louder. The loudest get locked into arms races. Repeat their messages more and more. At the end of it all Noise hasnt reduced and who gets attention from one day to the next is unpredicatble. And since Platforms dont want to talk about Shannon we are all stuck in some kind of red queen dynamic. People are expending lot of energy. Results are all temporary and unpredictable.
bricss 1 hour ago | parent
hdgvhicv 17 minutes ago | parent
elashri 1 hour ago | parent
But please don’t call it European spring.
MadrasThorn 37 minutes ago | parent
nomilk 57 minutes ago | parent
alex43578 53 minutes ago | parent
NorthernGulch 47 minutes ago | parent
nomilk 41 minutes ago | parent
> many of the conversations we have with founders begin with the founders saying a sentence that begins with "how do I.." and the partner answering with a sentence that begins with "just".
i.e. Often the most absurdly simple solution is the best one.
masfuerte 40 minutes ago | parent
throaway3534621 31 minutes ago | parent
nomilk 28 minutes ago | parent
Example: many believe the rich ought to be taxed more; but the problem is the Laffer curve: when they're taxed too much, they work less or leave France. So tax receipts go down (not up). End result: more "fairness" on paper but the people who actually depend on government funding have less of it (e.g. for education).
So the change harms the very people who are protesting for the change.
pil0u 22 minutes ago | parent
zht 16 minutes ago | parent
orwin 10 minutes ago | parent
hdgvhicv 29 minutes ago | parent
whatthejesus 28 minutes ago | parent
The people are concerned about the cost of oil I mean it’s the bombs that hit Iran that caused this not the French government.
Am I missing something? What drives people to burn shops down and assault people the next steps is assault rifles, so they should be happy without social media.
alibarber 22 minutes ago | parent
iLoveOncall 14 minutes ago | parent
plqbfbv 36 minutes ago | parent
pil0u 25 minutes ago | parent
plqbfbv 17 minutes ago | parent
Compare that with violent ones that see the opportunity coming with 3-4d heads-up (because peaceful protests are normally covered with a little advance - 3-4d - by mainstream press), create an Instagram/TikTok/Whatsapp/Snapchat group, spread it aggressively thanks to zero cost of social/IM, and their only objective is to smash everything in their path (and if they manage, steal some loot to resell).
throwaway384034 14 minutes ago | parent
Peaceful - Peaceful is an adjective meaning free from war, violence, conflict, or disturbance, as well as quiet, calm, and untroubled
Very few protests are truly "peaceful". There will always be a grey area with protests that make them controversial and difficult to manage while "peaceful protest" is usually used as a thought terminating term. Though riots are different and probably are made up of opportunists.
ButlerianJihad 6 minutes ago | parent
Now we strove for peace very purposefully and diligently. We were constantly coached and trained by our leadership on how to focus, and not engage any hecklers, and how to ignore provocateurs, because there were many.
But we were always successful at maintaining peaceful and even joyful, uplifting atmospheres. That was very important to us and our cause. If anyone ran into trouble, we were always careful to observe the laws and obey the authorities. That ensured an enduring welcome for us in marches and on the public right-of-ways.
lesspassiveobse 53 minutes ago | parent
gregor123915 52 minutes ago | parent
aatd86 22 minutes ago | parent
sylware 51 minutes ago | parent
Namely, in the end, they will have to switch off telecommunication as a whole... well, if they are not interested in gathering intelligence about the rioters.
And then real rioters will have 'mesh communication devices', and then govs will need EM jammers too.
Sooo... govs should work on good and wide spread EM jammers instead of trying to to block DNS...
Sopel 47 minutes ago | parent