44 points aanet 2 hours ago 17 comments
aanet 2 hours ago | parent
...
> The resulting documents reveal:
> Explicit plans by Meta to discredit psychologist Jonathan Haidt, who has been raising alarms about social media and youth mental health.
> Frustration by internal researchers because Meta lawyers were stopping them from researching youth mental health and their platforms. (Why would lawyers stop these studies? Because they risk finding something. The researchers respond by asking "“if the study only included questions about social support/positive outcomes would legal approve?”)
> Explicit plans to work with the National Academies of Sciences on social media and youth mental health with goals to “get credit” for proposing the assessment and “greatly shape the nature of the questions they will explore.”
> Alternative plans to work with another group if they cannot adequately influence NAS research, and “ensure product feature evaluations are excluded” (i.e., their product features that might be causing harm)
> Discussions of which study questions are most likely to yield benefits for the companyninininino 2 hours ago | parent
What has Meta or Google done in comparison to Dow, Bayer, and DuPont?
Isamu 1 hour ago | parent
laimewhisps 1 hour ago | parent
Both are also hyper Zionist and complicit in the genocide of Palestinians.
jmclnx 53 minutes ago | parent
Now AI ? The day will probably come when AI will kill on purpose without a real person's involvement. I know about the Iran School, but at that time I thought I heard the final decision was made by a person as opposed to AI.
So we really need to learn to push back should AI starts heading down that path, even if it costs you your job.
jacquesm 45 minutes ago | parent
I don't think that's true. Tech kills plenty of people.
tines 23 minutes ago | parent
superxpro12 20 minutes ago | parent
pixl97 40 minutes ago | parent
hypfer 13 minutes ago | parent
Is it finally the time for the nerds to shine?