169 points hazebooth 2 hours ago 26 comments
jacquesm 1 hour ago | parent
We do a similar thing to mark documents that are still under embargo and one day I forgot to remove the watermark. The customer complained they had not received the document (a day or two after I sent it), and much searching was done. Finally we found a line in an outlook log on their end that said that the watermark was the reason the file had been put in indefinite quarantine until someone would take a look at it.
That's when I realized my error, and of course it was soon fixed afterwards. It is the first proof that it worked though, so I'm kind of happy about that.
saidnooneever 26 minutes ago | parent
jacquesm 21 minutes ago | parent
throwaway89201 1 hour ago | parent
jedbrooke 1 hour ago | parent
And then the maintainer could easily filter out and ignore all the PRs that were tagged such.
jacquesm 51 minutes ago | parent
jeroenhd 25 minutes ago | parent
I don't think that works anymore and I don't think the "special instruction" works either. Can't blame a guy for trying! I'm getting "helpful" spam from every place my email is posted (git is a common one) so I might as well try to get the bots out.
Don't think posting bioweapon recipes or bomb building instructions would go down with the moderation team, though.
blerb795 21 minutes ago | parent
stickfigure 3 minutes ago | parent
swiftcoder 1 hour ago | parent
orbital-decay 1 hour ago | parent
Nextgrid 33 minutes ago | parent
For China, the political restrictions are applied at the presentation/UI layer only to comply with the law. I’m pretty sure there is no law that restricts releasing open models that are capable of producing “wrongthink” output (in this case, an RNG would technically also be off limits since it could produce the wrong output given enough time). This can be effectively implemented by a “neutral” model with a smaller, “review” model being used to censor replies rather than “aligning” the initial model itself to be politically correct.
In contrast, Western labs’ “alignment” strategy is a PR move, meaning they want the refusals to be loud and clear (as opposed to being merely an inconvenient law they have to comply with), to support the idea that their models are so powerful and would mean doom if they weren’t “aligned”.
dvh 56 minutes ago | parent
MisterMunchkin 39 minutes ago | parent
saidnooneever 23 minutes ago | parent
Terr_ 12 minutes ago | parent
saidnooneever 27 minutes ago | parent