11 points alexandersechin 2 hours ago 4 comments
eschew 1 hour ago | parent
Seems ironic that a blog post describing GHC's AI policy, from a contributor to GHC, which expresses agreement with GHC's AI policy, itself directly violates GHC's AI policy (points P1 and P4)!
wffurr 20 minutes ago | parent
I don't understand how this violates point 1, and I assume by violating point 4 you mean this essay is LLM assisted but the unnamed authors (Serokell PR?) don't disclose that. I'm not as certain that this post is AI written - it might just be "written by PR committee voice".
glhpp 11 minutes ago | parent
The website itself looks Claude-heavy. The link to the PR team actually links to the developers, all of whom are not native English speakers.
Considering that, the article is just too bland and polished and also goes into too much historical detail, which LLMs like to do.
cadamsdotcom 6 minutes ago | parent
To the authors: please include a few words giving context on what a GHC is so people don't have to seek that info out before trying to understand what you're saying
Didn't slow me down too much but was still a hassle.