215 points bashtoni 2 hours ago 37 comments
richrichardsson 2 hours ago | parent
I don't use Cursor or the VSCode extension, but know plenty in our organisation who use the latter. How worried should we be?
abirch 1 hour ago | parent
A malicious version of Anthropic’s Claude Code VS Code extension, version 2.1.313, was published to the Open VSX registry on Oct. 30. According to ChainCatcher, security researcher Paul McCarty, known as 6mile, described the finding in a post on the OpenSource Malware blog. Researchers confirmed the analyzed Open VSX release was malicious and submitted a threat report about the same version on Microsoft’s VS Code Marketplace as a precaution.
1shooner 1 hour ago | parent
What appears to be an official Binance account reporting it also:
https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/10-30-2026-claude-cod...
rolosa 1 hour ago | parent
episodeiv 1 hour ago | parent
henearkr 1 hour ago | parent
darkwi11ow 1 hour ago | parent
I suspect it's still Anthropic who were hacked, because they control OpenVSX account with release privileges.
edit:
Binance confirms my suspicions, via https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/10-30-2026-claude-cod...
The affected Open VSX extension is owned by Anthropic employee Igor Kofman, but it is unclear whether his account or another part of the publishing process was compromised.tyingq 1 hour ago | parent
AdrianCX 32 minutes ago | parent
This could have been avoided by having extensions signed by company doing them with keys and review
darkwi11ow 29 minutes ago | parent
AdrianCX 23 minutes ago | parent
Binance got a pretty expensive lesson if that was the cause for their recent hack
darkwi11ow 11 minutes ago | parent
K0nserv 1 hour ago | parent
Version 2.1.313 is missing from the official Claude Code GitHub repo's CHANGELOG[0]. There's also no tag[1] for 2.1.313[1], but 2.1.312[2], and 2.1.314[3] exist.
0: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/blob/main/CHANGELO...
1: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/releases/tag/v2.1....
2: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/releases/tag/v2.1....
3: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/releases/tag/v2.1....
no-name-here 40 minutes ago | parent
Is there any industry standard about if a compromised version is distributed via one channel, the owner does or doesn’t drop/bump that same version on unaffected channels too?
glimshe 1 hour ago | parent
_heimdall 1 hour ago | parent
nannal 20 minutes ago | parent
Its sort of like having a sysadmin constantly watching. Poking through logs pcaps & monitoring for unusual activities.
Also works with local models well enough.
Geezus_42 11 minutes ago | parent
eviks 1 hour ago | parent
MisterTea 15 minutes ago | parent
K0nserv 1 hour ago | parent
cube00 45 minutes ago | parent
I've started developing with a separate user account to limit the blast radius but you still need to login to access repos and use AI features.
helsinkiandrew 54 minutes ago | parent
That's a bit hyperbolic: someone released a version of the Claude Code VS Code extension with a backdoor on the Cursor marketplace:
> a maliciously modified version of Anthropic’s Claude Code extension was made available in the Cursor VS Code extension Marketplace
https://cursor.com/blog/claude-code-extension-security-notic...
darkwi11ow 43 minutes ago | parent
Cursor does a bad reporting branding OpenVSX as "Cursor Marketplace". What a joke the company had become under Elon. But also it might be related to Anthropic/SpaceX business ties, they try to minimize damage on Anthropic pre-IPO
swingboy 37 minutes ago | parent
darkwi11ow 35 minutes ago | parent
psychoslave 38 minutes ago | parent
The matrix has you Andrew.
I know, I should have launched a career in conspirationism.
nickphx 39 minutes ago | parent
jedisct1 31 minutes ago | parent
This is fine.
VoidWhisperer 30 minutes ago | parent
gcr 8 minutes ago | parent
xteam 16 minutes ago | parent
xteam 15 minutes ago | parent