20 points janisz 1 hour ago 9 comments

duke_sam 33 minutes ago | parent

An aspect of this I find interesting is that previously effort was a reasonably good barrier to making something new. If a feature/library existed someone cared enough to put the work in to make it exist.

Now it’s just a question of tokens. The presentation/feature list is no sign of effort or caring. So we get limitless new shiny things to try and filter through

Sharlin 18 minutes ago | parent

It’s possibly a good thing in disguise. Maybe it will make software dev finally more inclined to focus on tested and true technologies rather than chasing trendy novelty stuff.

(Oh, who am I kidding, it’s AI that do tech decisions now and they choose whatever stuff that’s overrepresented in their training data, or just NIH stuff, which has inexplicably become a virtue, like measuring progress by lines of code spent has become. )

drawfloat 8 minutes ago | parent

Pretty sure bringing up tokens immediately is itself an example of this.

codeulike 27 minutes ago | parent

This is just a rebranding of novelty bias to make it seem like a new idea

rwoerz 23 minutes ago | parent

Novelty bias is soooo 2025

jareklupinski 7 minutes ago | parent

cant wait till fads are retro again

tough 18 minutes ago | parent

There's a meta-recursion there that's kinda funny innit

mcphage 18 minutes ago | parent

In boardgame communities, it’s called “Cult of the New”.

gspr 7 minutes ago | parent

I wonder if this has any relevance at all to a bunch of new stuff that people on HN seem very obsessed over these days.