21 points bookofjoe 1 hour ago 10 comments

thisisauserid 1 hour ago | parent

Unintentional napping was associated with possible/probable dementia.

Intentional napping was not.

One could easily reverse cause and effect here.

ahartmetz 49 minutes ago | parent

Easily. I'm 80% sure that they did reverse cause and effect.

causal 47 minutes ago | parent

Yeah I feel like the results could be stated more clearly. At any rate this doesn't seem to associate risk with any chosen behavior.

kirth_gersen 31 minutes ago | parent

It seems to me that perhaps the data better supports that dementia is correlated with unintentional and short naps. This makes it sound like they think it is causal, which I doubt.

tyrabound 22 minutes ago | parent

Yes, ironically they even admit possible reverse causal effect along with many other causal variables. Frankly, this is not exactly stellar research in my view, at least with the rather reckless insinuations not supported.

reedf1 56 minutes ago | parent

I am a frequent intentional napper (< 30 minutes). Am I right in reading that I am at baseline risk?

thisisauserid 51 minutes ago | parent

See what I mean?

gwbas1c 51 minutes ago | parent

I think we need to understand what intentional vs unintentional napping is.

Carrok 33 minutes ago | parent

Is this not clear from the term?

"I'm going to go take a nap in bed."

vs

"I fell asleep in a chair."

falsemyrmidon 49 minutes ago | parent

I'd guess this goes back to not getting enough healthy sleep, which is a reason people nap.