YHK - yet another hacker news clone

Mac at Any Scale

82 points anner_ 2 hours ago 22 comments

miniman1337 1 hour ago | parent

Isnt it against the Apple EULA to sell VMs of Macos? Love the creative problem solving with the HW.

kylec 1 hour ago | parent

I don't know about selling, but Apple permits up to 2 virtualized Macs to run on a Mac. If they are circumventing this limit that would be an issue, but it doesn't sound like they are.

miniman1337 52 minutes ago | parent

Ah okay - and the 24 hour minimum rental time doesn't apply to VMs? Im just curious how they are getting around the limits that Mac Stadium and AWS have.

hmartin 1 hour ago | parent

> A well-known limitation is that Apple only allows two macOS VMs per physical Mac. It can be a Mac Pro with 24 cores and 192 GB memory, yet it is limited to running only two guest VMs. This limitation leaks into our product offering: we can only slice Mac resources in two halves. So we run instances with 6 or 12 cores on 14-core Mac Minis and 8/16-core instances on 18-core MacBooks (we reserve a couple cores for management overhead).

scosman 53 minutes ago | parent

Wild to see them using MacBook Pros and not Mac Mini/Studio. Curious how that possible makes sense for economics and cooling.

fckgw 34 minutes ago | parent

They answer that in literally the first paragraph in the article.

TL:DR; They couldn't buy enough minis or studios.

solatic 48 minutes ago | parent

The cost of cloud Mac hardware is quite frankly ludicrous across the board. Namespace's minimum for an M6 is, what, $0.06/minute for 6 vCPU? And that's on the cheap end - Semaphore wants $0.09/minute for 4 vCPU and GitHub Actions wants $0.062/minute for M1 hardware (forget AWS pricing even which is even more atrocious).

If I run just a UI test suite for an hour, that's $3.60/run, which is now higher than what I'm paying for AI inference that made the change that triggered the run. That's crazy! If I ran even just one run per night that would run me more than $100/month. A Mac Mini is $900 - I break even in nine months by buying the hardware outright. If I run multiple UI test suites per day, I break even much faster. These ARM chips are so power-light that the cost of electricity is practically irrelevant, and after all, these aren't rack-mounted monstrosities with 90 dB fans - they're meant to cool themselves sitting on your desk. Maybe it's different if you need like 60 of them?

Is anyone even running the numbers before they sign up? Or are companies really running that many Minis and are paying the premium to outsource the DCOps?

MonkeyClub 21 minutes ago | parent

> A Mac Mini is $900 - I break even in nine months by buying the hardware outright.

The clue to their decision may be right there, potentially going for an increase in sales.

But nowadays it seems they suffer from a lack of vision and drive; perhaps (hopefully) they’ll come around.

robin_reala 11 minutes ago | parent

I have a test suite that needs to run on a Mac in a project that merges < 20 PRs a year. No point in provisioning our own Mac and maintaining it for that.

skrrtww 47 minutes ago | parent

> You can't build iOS apps without a Mac.

I'm not sure this is true anymore.

giwook 36 minutes ago | parent

It is.

nout 34 minutes ago | parent

You can build iOS apps on Omarchy now

graypegg 29 minutes ago | parent

xtool [0] came up on here a while ago [1]. I think it still requires you get a big xcode app bundle off a macos machine and drop that into xtool, since there's no other way to get the iOS library header files from Apple. The other parts of xcode just aren't used as far as I know. Other than that caveat, you're running builds in xtool's own environment on whatever platform you choose. You can even do code signing.

[0] https://xtool.sh

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44011515

devmor 42 minutes ago | parent

The registry distribution subject "for another blog post" is the most interesting part of this to me. I'm very interested in the efficiency/locality metrics that went into designing that. I look forward to that future post.

kccqzy 40 minutes ago | parent

Amazing article. It just goes to show how many problems they are solving just to work around bugs and limitations within Apple itself. I’d wager a guess that if Apple made a new Xserve with the same performance as a Mac mini but twice the price people would still buy them, because figuring out data center operations is expensive.

nwellinghoff 36 minutes ago | parent

I really wonder if Apple's logic to require a sale of a unit for 2 VMs is fiscally correct. Seems like it would be better to open it up to virtualization such that more devs can make iOS and macOS apps. Is the community of devs being forced to buy mac hw just do dev a iOS/macOs app so large that its worth putting us through all this HASSLE? Maybe they are worried about clone machine/farms that will eat into their sales. Idk. Because they are so VM unfriendly, I refuse to deal with Apple's bs.

intrasight 11 minutes ago | parent

> Is the community of devs being forced to buy mac hw just do dev a iOS/macOs app so large

Yes.

Why else would you buy such an expensive machine with such a crappy operating system?

someguyiguess 7 minutes ago | parent

Not crappy. Skill issue.

00deadbeef 21 minutes ago | parent

This article is dated November 3rd yet I've read it months ago, it was already in my history.

wslh 20 minutes ago | parent

I am lost, doing it in a Hackintosh is feasible but against EULA terms? I remember having a Hackintosh around the office two years ago (yes, it was x64 based). BTW I just found "ARM is not a universal architecture, there will be no more Hackintosh" [1].

[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/hackintosh/comments/1uboij0/arm_is_...

andai 13 minutes ago | parent

Title should be edited to "Putting hundreds of MacBooks in a data center (because Apple is silly)" imo

fillskills 7 minutes ago | parent

Man, kudos to the person or AI who designed their website. Easy to read, easy to find any information, with eye catching branding.