20 points artrax 1 hour ago 1 comments

qsort 13 minutes ago | parent

The author is correct in pointing out that this is a continuation and amplification of an existing trend.

I'm in the data space fighting the good fight, spreading the gospel of Just Using Postgres, and I'm seeing more and more benchmarks that look extremely dubious. Query performance is like choosing a data structure in ordinary programming: it depends almost entirely of what access pattern you expect at runtime; it's entirely pointless to go search for the world's fastest linked list if you needed a hash table. Compare with the situation in the modern data engineering landscape. Are you sure the solution measured by the benchmark is actually a solution to your problem, let alone a significant improvement over Just Using Postgres? Have you measured or are you going on marketing and vibes?

Again, I'm sure solutions like this have a place, but at least right now it's not the same place as traditional engines.