53 points vinyl7 52 minutes ago 37 comments
650 28 minutes ago | parent
zja 24 minutes ago | parent
jacoplane 21 minutes ago | parent
zhivota 15 minutes ago | parent
It's federal permitting, local "NIMBY" veto control over everything, state environmental laws, tariffs on solar equipment, and out of control costs on infrastructure in the US (a combination of corruption, overpowered unions, and regulations).
Like many problems in the US, the causes are many and diffused across different layers of government, different departments, making it very difficult to solve.
dleeftink 28 minutes ago | parent
mcoliver 20 minutes ago | parent
dleeftink 15 minutes ago | parent
peter422 25 minutes ago | parent
mcoliver 18 minutes ago | parent
mathgeek 18 minutes ago | parent
soulofmischief 16 minutes ago | parent
PowerElectronix 25 minutes ago | parent
xgulfie 21 minutes ago | parent
This... isn't how capitalism works. If nVidia or whoever sells chips the money doesn't just magically go into strategic infrastructure
bobsmooth 19 minutes ago | parent
p-e-w 21 minutes ago | parent
And if trends had continued from 1900, our streets would be covered 200 feet high in horse droppings.
mathgeek 16 minutes ago | parent
nl 19 minutes ago | parent
If the other front-age article on the Science publication about how human population will have overwhelmed the earth by now isn't enough warning, then I'm old enough to remember how the "Japanese economic miracle" was going to inevitably overwhelm the US.
There is a serious lack of wisdom in lots of these statements.
I like to remind people that multiple mainstream "AI Safety" campaigners have called for first strikes on Chinese data centers:
In a new report titled “Superpowers and AGI,” former Obama-era national security official Jacob Stokes calls for United States to begin preparing readiness drills in response to Chinese AI development — up to and including military strikes on the nation’s data centers, the South China Morning Post reported.
“Data centers can be bombed with conventional munitions,” Stokes writes. (He’s not the first thinker to suggest bombings to stop powerful AI; in 2023, AI critic Eliezer Yudkowsky suggested that countries needed to be ready to “destroy a rogue data center by airstrike.”)
https://futurism.com/science-energy/obama-admin-official-sto...
https://www.cnas.org/publications/reports/superpowers-and-ag...
ryandrake 16 minutes ago | parent
War Hawks gotta war hawk.
Ever since the fall of the USSR, there has been a faction of people in the USA desperately trying to invent a new "enemy" to scare everyone and drive foreign policy.
noosphr 17 minutes ago | parent
This is something a capitalism country can't do.
In short we need to build a five grids worth of nuclear power plants as a national security priority, the same way the interstate highway network was, if we want to have any chance of keeping up.
In the mean time we can use gas turbines to make up the short fall for the next five years.
01100011 10 minutes ago | parent
What we need, for many reasons, is a national water grid. The grid would provide plenty of pumped hydro to store solar power and return it to the grid at night. It would also resolve flooding issues and provide food security in the face of climate change. I don't think our country thinks that big anymore though.
tremarley 8 minutes ago | parent
The US could have it's own Three Gorges Dam on the Mississippi River, but it displaced 2 million people.
tremarley 10 minutes ago | parent
cowpig 7 minutes ago | parent
Can you explain this statement?
> China's grid uses them to lower emissions during the day but has idle coal plants to keep the lights on definitely.
This is not what is happening.
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/annual-co2-emissions-per-...
randysalami 17 minutes ago | parent
Claims like: "It probably doesn’t work, can you outthink steel and drone production? I don’t see how, see my critiques here. But I’m not totally sure, I’m not a superintelligence. And if it does work, that may be the end"
"Whatever capabilities you have today will eventually be matched, unless… you believe that you can use ASI in a decapitating first strike."
"My likelihood of imminent WWIII went up a lot with the nationalization of NVIDIA."
Who is this guy? The head of another AI driving company? Yet he feels qualified to make wargaming predictions between nation states and somehow end up on the front page with a few substanceless paragraphs and one graph. Wow. Is this pay to win? I know I am being critical and I apologize but come on, we can do so much better as a community and as a culture.
EDIT: this had no comments or upvotes really when I posted this
But literally this is all it is:
"Internalize this graph, we post it on this blog a lot. If trends continue, China will have 10x the electricity of the US in 10 years. Whenever you think about geopolitical strategy, always keep it in mind, because whatever your plans are must consider this.
Here’s a strategy that would make sense for America long term. Sell as many AI chips into China as possible, use the money to purchase solar panel and battery factories, and build out electricity capacity as quickly as possible. Fundamentally, compute is a function of electricity. That’s the sort of long term thinking that gives America a chance. With robotic labor, immigrants like Jensen and Elon, a business friendly culture, and an incredible chunk of land, it’s not so clear who is ahead in 50 years. Regardless, I do know this strategy would lead to massive prosperity for the citizens of both countries.
However, that’s not close to what we see happening. We see a lot of short term zero sum thinking in action. It’s very scary what the US “AI race” mentality leads to. When exactly does the race end? Whatever capabilities you have today will eventually be matched, unless…
…you believe that you can use ASI in a decapitating first strike.
I’m worried that this is what these people see as the only way out.
It probably doesn’t work, can you outthink steel and drone production? I don’t see how, see my critiques here. But I’m not totally sure, I’m not a superintelligence. And if it does work, that may be the end.
My likelihood of imminent WWIII went up a lot with the nationalization of NVIDIA."
bigcat12345678 16 minutes ago | parent
You don't need the AI chips money to fund solar expansion. Solar panels are already tariffed exuberantly. Removing that tariff, solar expansion will not be faster at all, because there will be another random political faction coming out to eat the profit.
This country inherited a honorable tradition that is no longer fitting in this highly connected world. And few people are educated to objectively acknowledge that.
kelnos 15 minutes ago | parent
And I don't get his link to the X post that he's labeled "nationalizing nvidia"; what he links to is... not that.
I agree in general that the US is completely mismanaging the adversarial relationship with China, but this post reads like a conspiracy theorist fever dream.
0x4e 15 minutes ago | parent
80fj0348i 11 minutes ago | parent
I.e. if you turn on a light switch in your home, somewhere, a turbine has almost certainly just sped up very slightly with approximately a speed of light delay.
redox99 9 minutes ago | parent
flemhans 9 minutes ago | parent