208 points jshchnz 2 days ago 310 comments
Serious question: why aren't so many startups hiring processes filtering out a candidate who is scamming/working multiple jobs?
revskill 2 days ago | parent
Seriously, a good programmer cares about good abstraction, not the correct cloud setup.
Those startups are worth the scam, it's skill issue all the way down.
robswc 2 days ago | parent
I'm no longer job searching but every interview involved multiple steps and "background checks."
I'm seeing the dude's resume has him working half a dozen jobs in a year which even to me is a huge red flag. Then he has a github with automated commits... I don't want to be disparaging to start ups because its brutal out there but how does someone like that have such a high success rate? Is he taking a super low salary or something?
robswc 2 days ago | parent
deepsun 2 days ago | parent
mistrial9 2 days ago | parent
gk1 2 days ago | parent
deepsun 1 day ago | parent
crossroadsguy 2 days ago | parent
ReptileMan 1 day ago | parent
Aurornis 2 days ago | parent
There was one Tweet from someone who said they did a reference check from someone who said he did good work when he was working, but he was working multiple jobs at the same time so he wasn't working much. Maybe he assumed his references wouldn't be checked often, and maybe he was right?
bibek_poudel 2 days ago | parent
Perhaps, he is also genuinely good at cracking these interviews. No wonder, he's been through so many of them.
mathiaspoint 2 days ago | parent
skeeter2020 1 day ago | parent
alpb 1 day ago | parent
mpeg 1 day ago | parent
sreekanth850 23 hours ago | parent
anon_2222 20 hours ago | parent
sreekanth850 12 hours ago | parent
ATechGuy 2 days ago | parent
jasonthorsness 2 days ago | parent
occamsrazorwit 2 days ago | parent
thisisit 2 days ago | parent
Aurornis 1 day ago | parent
The same goes for hiring tricks. When some hiring signal becomes a trick that gets passed around by influencers, it ceases to become a useful hiring signal because everyone is gaming it.
If this guy started advertising his process, everyone would start doing his process and it would stop working.
kjkjadksj 21 hours ago | parent
pxc 21 hours ago | parent
asdf6969 19 hours ago | parent
seydor 1 day ago | parent
jm20 2 days ago | parent
Given these two factors, I don’t think it would be out of the realm of possibility for something like this to happen.
meistertigran 2 days ago | parent
darth_aardvark 2 days ago | parent
jonathan-adly 2 days ago | parent
So, super easy to scam all of them with the same skillset and mannerism.
dazzeloid 2 days ago | parent
worked for us for almost a year and did a solid job (we also let him go when we discovered the multiple jobs)
robswc 2 days ago | parent
When I used to interview I always had to check a box that said I wasn't currently employed, or they would ask at some point.
the_real_cher 2 days ago | parent
deepsun 2 days ago | parent
avmich 2 days ago | parent
cududa 2 days ago | parent
the_real_cher 2 days ago | parent
Cults are a subset of teams.
skeeter2020 1 day ago | parent
Both have implicit contracts, and a contract requires consideration on both sides. The parties define the value of the consideration, so you can have a junior cult member who feels they are getting good value for what they pay, or a SW dev at an insurance company who feels they don't. I also don't see much difference in your ability to affect your situation if you are unhappy with the current state.
gk1 2 days ago | parent
I had an “over-employed” person on my team (who lied about it) and I can confirm what all others are saying about this guy: they start going AWOL, miss important discussions, miss deadlines, blame their colleagues (creating toxic culture), start doing shoddy work because they’re not thinking deeply through problems and also to keep expectations low, create busywork for others to take the pressure off themselves, use company resources and accounts for other projects (creating security issues, among others)… just to name a few reasons.
It’s not about possessiveness. Many co’s are glad to hire contractors, who don’t “belong” to them.
Aurornis 1 day ago | parent
It blows my mind that overemployed people have become folk heroes. They're obviously not putting full effort into two jobs.
I had the same experience as you with an "overemployed" person: Working with them is really bad for everyone else. They lie, play extreme politics, throw teammates under the bus, make you work harder for everything, and they don't care if it causes you harm because you're just a temporary coworker at one of their "Js"
There's nothing to celebrate about these people. They screw over their teammates far more than the company they work for.
throwawaysleep 1 day ago | parent
So you could fight us, but plenty just join us in playing games, lowering expectations, and collecting their check and going home. We are awful colleagues if you have ambition, but if you do not, we get along fine with people.
ponector 1 day ago | parent
What blows my mind is people think overemployment of an engineer is bad, but it is more than acceptable for CEO to held top positions in different companies.
oceanplexian 1 day ago | parent
The difference is in most cases the CEO owns the business or a good chunk of it so they’re actually capital owners and employees in name only. If you own the business you make the rules.
more_corn 23 hours ago | parent
toast0 21 hours ago | parent
dakiol 1 day ago | parent
skeeter2020 1 day ago | parent
asdf6969 19 hours ago | parent
nyarlathotep_ 17 hours ago | parent
What about people that put full effort and then some into jobs with long hours and loads of stress just to get hit with a PIP or get caught in the latest round of layoffs?
If that's how companies treat people, what's so wrong with 'overemployed' people having a fallback, especially in today's market?
mablopoule 6 hours ago | parent
skeeter2020 1 day ago | parent
astura 1 hour ago | parent
He would blow off any meeting before noon. Just wouldn't show up.
His work was usually late and rushed/poor quality. Lots of corners cut. Oftentimes he didn't even get something right the first time because he didn't have the full context because he missed discussion that happened in the meetings he didn't show up to.
He was full of shit. Every day he was having some personal tragedy. Excuse after excuse.
He started trouble with teammates in a way I've just never seen before.
He was just all around a net negative even though he occasionally did decent work. Everyone was happy to see him go.
Aurornis 2 days ago | parent
It also drags everyone else down. The team figures out what's going on. They get tired of adjusting their communication around the one person who's always distracted and doing something else.
Basically, it turns into a lot of work for everyone else to get work out of the OE person. Like they can do good work, but they're going to make everyone else work hard to extract it from them because they're busy juggling multiple jobs.
All of the Soham stories I've read today have been the same: Good work when he was working, but he was caught because he wasn't working much.
nickip 2 days ago | parent
FootballBat 1 day ago | parent
thepasswordis 1 day ago | parent
dragonwriter 1 day ago | parent
skeeter2020 1 day ago | parent
georgemcbay 22 hours ago | parent
In my opinion and experience, being a competent developer and being a good interviewer are even less related than being a competent developer and being a good interviewee (and the latter are already very unrelated).
icedchai 1 day ago | parent
StackRanker3000 17 hours ago | parent
chanux 2 hours ago | parent
nyarlathotep_ 17 hours ago | parent
Think it says a lot about this industry if "really talented 'engineer'" means passing loads of gamified interviews and not delivering things on time.
StackRanker3000 17 hours ago | parent
tuckerpo 2 days ago | parent
... why? If the guy's doing well by all metrics and not leaking IP, literally, who cares?
spwa4 2 days ago | parent
1) from the employer side, this runs afoul of all MBA theory and practice, so he could have been more profits. Almost by definition, this means you're not getting the maximum out of the guy. Oh and there's jealousy of course.
2) from employee's side, this runs afoul of union thinking. Those jobs could have employed 5 people, maybe more. Oh and there's jealousy of course.
thomassmith65 2 days ago | parent
ls-a 1 hour ago | parent
soneca 2 days ago | parent
So I think that finding about multiple employment is actually about realizing he was lying the whole time with the excuses.
Aurornis 2 days ago | parent
All of them say he did good work when he was working, but it was obvious that he was trying to do it as a part-time job.
karel-3d 1 day ago | parent
You need some degree of trust in your employees (you cannot "verify" all the time), and you cannot trust some guy you KNOW is cheating on you.
rpcorb 22 hours ago | parent
rincebrain 2 days ago | parent
(Hell, every so often various companies randomly decide that I and someone with almost the same full name as I are the same person, even without that person ever having had an account with the company, and then it's a pain to straighten it out because they all claim they have no insight into where those black box systems pull this information...yes, I'm really quite sure that I did not have a lease on this kind of car before I was born.)
Doubly so, I imagine, if you're not in the US, depending on whether you're an actual FTE or a contractor or what.
I find it hard to be sympathetic to the companies though, really - given how quickly the organizations that love to use family metaphors and imagery to describe their culture will drop people if it's inconvenient for the company, I don't think they get to cry foul on someone thinking they're entitled to the work as promised and nothing else.
gargoyle9123 2 days ago | parent
I can tell you it's because he's actually a very skilled engineer. He will blow the interviews completely out of the water. Easily top 1% or top 0.1% of candidates -- other startups will tell you this as well.
The problem is when the job (or work-trial in our case) actually starts, it's just excuses upon excuses as to why he's missing a meeting, or why the PR was pushed late. The excuses become more ridiculous and unbelievable, up until it's obvious he's just lying.
Other people in this thread are incorrect, it's not a dev. shop. I worked with Soham in-person for 2 days during the work-trial process, he's good. He left half of each day with some excuse about meeting a lawyer.
Aurornis 2 days ago | parent
I worked with an overemployed person (not Soham). It was exactly like this.
Started out great. They could do good work when they knew they were in focus. Then they started pushing deliverables out farther and farther until it was obvious they weren't trying. Meetings were always getting rescheduled with an array of excuses. Lots of sad stories about family members having tragedies over and over again.
It wears everyone down. Team mates figure it out first. Management loses patience.
Worst part is that one person exhausts the entire department's trust. Remote work gets scrutinized more. Remote employees are tracked more closely. It does a lot of damage to remote work.
> Other people in this thread are incorrect, it's not a dev. shop. I worked with Soham in-person for 2 days during the work-trial process, he's good.
I doubt it's a dev shop because the dev shops use rotating stand-ins to collect the paychecks, not the same identity at every job. This guy wanted paychecks sent directly to him.
However, I wouldn't be surprised if he tried to hire other devs to outsource some of his workload while he remained the interaction point with the company.
> He left half of each day with some excuse about meeting a lawyer.
Wild to be cutting work trial days in half to do other jobs. Although I think he was also testing companies to see who was lenient enough to let him get away with all of this.
gyomu 2 days ago | parent
What a silly waste of his time and reputation (in addition to other people's).
If he's that competent, he could hire/mentor juniors and just use his skills to run a contracting business and keep making big bucks while not having to lie all the time?
Aurornis 1 day ago | parent
I've worked with several small contracting businesses, including some that came highly recommended.
They were all very inefficient relative to having someone in-house. They also came with the problem that institutional knowledge was non-existent because they had a rotating crew of people working for you.
Hiring someone in-house is more efficient and better for building institutional knowledge. The companies he applied for specifically did not want to contract the work out to a body shop.
dzhiurgis 1 day ago | parent
aleph_minus_one 1 day ago | parent
Then make it part of the contracting deal that the contractors have to give the in-house people sufficient training about the code/project that they worked on.
jokethrowaway 22 hours ago | parent
If you keep your standards high when hiring contractors you'll get the same level of quality you have with employees. Contractor agencies are also pretty happy to have long lasting clients (I have been with my current clients respectively for: 4 years, 3 years, 1 years and 1 month).
tomp 1 day ago | parent
Much much easier said than done.
99% of companies that want to hire employees won't hire a contractor/consultant instead for that job.
How do I know? 15 years experience, top candidate in many interviews, great salary / employment. Yet every time I've tried to get a consulting arrangement set up it's been extremely hard and ultimately unprofitable (i.e. pays significantly less than full-time job, on average).
aleph_minus_one 1 day ago | parent
Sounds like a legit negotiation strategy:
- You prefer a consulting arrangement over being hired.
- The company prefers to pay less for the job.
So both involved sides get a part of the pie that is negotiated about, and has to compromise on another aspect.
saulpw 18 hours ago | parent
krageon 3 hours ago | parent
jokethrowaway 22 hours ago | parent
I work as a contractors with all my clients (who know of each others) and they all pay significantly more per hour compared to an employee. As an employee I could expect to make 1/4 of what I actually make.
The only exception in this arrangement was when I worked with an US company, they wanted to hire me as an employee and paid 1k per month to some company in my country just to hire me. An insane waste of money, not to mention taxes on my side.
mh- 21 hours ago | parent
altairprime 18 hours ago | parent
burnt-resistor 7 hours ago | parent
Being disloyal and breaking trust and reputation for temporary gain is crazy.
snthpy 2 days ago | parent
gk1 2 days ago | parent
/someone who discovered an over-employed person on his team and wondered the same thing
snthpy 1 day ago | parent
I would have thought that with the litigious culture in the US and non-competes etc... this would all be watertight. Seems kinda ridiculous that with a non-compete you can't work for a competitor once you've quit but you're free to do so while you still work for your employer, lol.
FootballBat 1 day ago | parent
dragonwriter 1 day ago | parent
snthpy 1 day ago | parent
dragonwriter 1 day ago | parent
While US employment is usually at will without a defined contract term, there are mutually enforceable obligations, including some definition of what the employee is obligated to do for the employer and that the employer is obligated to pay the employee at some specified rate assuming the employee's obligations are met. That's a contract. Exactly what the detailed terms are may be difficult to prove absent a single comprehensive written document, but it is a contract.
reshlo 15 hours ago | parent
KPGv2 9 hours ago | parent
lproven 1 day ago | parent
Really? Does that mean what it say: you get a job and you do not get a written contract?
I don't think, in 38 years of working in 3 different countries, I've ever NOT had a written contract, even for temp or contractor roles. WTAF?
brudgers 22 hours ago | parent
Executives can be an exception.
Exceptional circumstances are an exception.
Increasingly less common union jobs are an exception.
But ‘at will’ is far more common in the US.
lproven 19 hours ago | parent
toast0 22 hours ago | parent
lproven 19 hours ago | parent
icedchai 1 day ago | parent
hilux 1 day ago | parent
Possibly these are becoming more common because of /r/overemployed.
Most companies don't want you working another W-2 job, but realize they can't just ban all consulting.
javagram 1 day ago | parent
That pretty much automatically rules out over employment because you can’t separately promise two different companies that you’re assigning all software copyrights to them rather than you, it’s an incompatible contract (even if it’s limited to work hours - you’re pretending to both companies that you’re working 9-5 solely for them).
burnerthrow008 23 hours ago | parent
There are some nuances and I'm not a lawyer, but the gist of it is that three ways to trigger the IP to attach to your employer:
1. You do it on-prem or during work hours (but work hours are flexible for salaried employees)
2. You do it using company equipment (say, company laptop at home)
3. It's reasonably related to what you or other people do at your day job
If none of those apply, then you own it. That's relevant to the discussion at hand because, at least in California, you could work from home for two companies with unrelated businesses and not break any rules.
hilux 9 hours ago | parent
Familiar to fans of HBO's _Silicon Valley_!
immibis 20 hours ago | parent
All successful big tech businesses - all of them - got that way by openly breaking laws. They don't trigger automatically, but upon a manual review, triggered by someone with at least a couple grand to spend on the endeavour. A lot flies under the radar in practice.
samgranieri 12 hours ago | parent
roll20 2 days ago | parent
dragonwriter 1 day ago | parent
If you can get and hold dozens of concurrent full-time engineering jobs by scamming people, you can get much further much more quickly than is possible in any one of the full-time engineering jobs you can get.
This is obviously unethical, relies on non-guaranteed success, and falls apart if people are able to effectively claw back your gains from scamming, but that's not (obviously) enough to outweigh the desire for quick returns for some people.
dzhiurgis 1 day ago | parent
Do you really think several busy startups are going to band up and sue a person (esp in California)?
anon_2222 2 days ago | parent
anukin 1 day ago | parent
wanderlust123 16 hours ago | parent
jacob_a_dev 12 hours ago | parent
Having worked at sexy-startup for 9 months recently with a good excuse why you left would get your resume to the top of the pile if it was read
maxnevermind 11 hours ago | parent
NameForComment 1 day ago | parent
It is hilarious that companies that hired a guy who was scamming them are also convinced they are great at assessing the skill level of devs.
Aurornis 1 day ago | parent
Someone can be a good developer and also be a scammer. I don't understand why you think this is hilarious or weird.
conartist6 1 day ago | parent
Also there's a ton amazing engs out there who want and need work but the companies all only want that one "perfect" guy (or gal), as if such a thing exists
kgwgk 1 day ago | parent
One could expect good developers to be less inclined to fraud as they may not “need” it as much.
That also made me thing of Berkson’s paradox: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkson%27s_paradox
If these were really independent traits they would look negatively correlated as we talk about people who are good OR scammers.
KaoruAoiShiho 1 day ago | parent
kgwgk 1 day ago | parent
immibis 20 hours ago | parent
rpcorb 22 hours ago | parent
mkipper 1 day ago | parent
ojr 18 hours ago | parent
sbmthakur 19 hours ago | parent
wanderlust123 16 hours ago | parent
hooloovoo_zoo 17 hours ago | parent
mpeg 1 day ago | parent
sorcerer-mar 23 hours ago | parent
mpeg 21 hours ago | parent
1. You can use an employer of record service which costs a few hundred bucks a month – it seems like a lot... but if I'm already paying a recruiter £12 to £25k to find me a senior data engineer in London on £80 to 120k that is going to want to WFH 3/4 days a week, I will gladly pay £400/mo for an EOR service
2. You can also not hire them, and use their services as independent contractors instead. I've never had an issue doing this with my finance teams, as long as the contractor submits a valid invoice they don't care who they are. Plus, it's good for cashflow (net 30 to net 90 is pretty standard) and the hire gets a nice tax save on their end.
I do understand that at large companies it can be tricky, but IMHO at startups there is little excuse. I suppose it all doesn't matter if you're playing with unlimited silicon valley VC money, I've only ever had to deal with european investors and they love a bit of smart frugality.
sorcerer-mar 21 hours ago | parent
I agree if I had the UK talent pool domestically, European investors, a different health insurance regime, and existed in a different timezone, the calculus might be different.
Aside: how many people were at the company where you were paying recruiters $25k to find people?
msgodel 1 hour ago | parent
aristofun 21 hours ago | parent
By that you mean more like "he is top 0.1% at leetcode and whatever broken hiring process we have" ?
Why would really top 0.1% engineer go for all the hustle with small startups. If he could score a single job at some overfunded AI company and get even more with less risks?
This doesn't add up at all, sorry.
ivape 20 hours ago | parent
If we have a pile of shit, surely shit eaters will be attracted to it
In which case George Santos is just a very testable hypothesis (it's like watching a 5 year old walk up to a cookie jar when the adults are gone). Congress attracts a certain type. What did you attract and why is an unavoidable question. In fact, it's scientific. You would think tech people would recognize the locust of non technical people entering the industry as some kind of an indicator, some measurable thing ...
We need to run more formal scientific experiments to document what happened in this industry.
moralestapia 19 hours ago | parent
k
aprdm 19 hours ago | parent
How do you measure that ? It seems like he wasn't a good candidate after all. I hope y`all learn a lesson about hiring and moving away from things that aren't signal to a job.
wanderlust123 17 hours ago | parent
AndrewKemendo 11 hours ago | parent
Sometimes it works sometimes it doesn’t, but keeping the myth going even if it comes with bad stories is valuable.
burnt-resistor 7 hours ago | parent
If they're so talented, then they should probably work on their own thing.
msgodel 1 hour ago | parent
I don't think anyone has the morals or trust anymore for the way we used to do corporate work.
Bjorkbat 2 days ago | parent
Like, I can't wrap my head around this many people having some kind of experience with a single guy who's claim to be fame is basically gaming the interview process at an incredible amount of Y Combinator startups.
occamsrazorwit 2 days ago | parent
Aurornis 1 day ago | parent
data_yum_yum 2 days ago | parent
Why didn't he get the option to remain an anonymous scandal?
We don't need to know his name to discuss his actions.
Aurornis 2 days ago | parent
data_yum_yum 2 days ago | parent
Relevant people can share it privately and put out a public warning about obviously noticeable behavioral patterns.
Couple issues here:
1) Sharing it wide open on the Web for the whole world to see and everyone to poke fun of is a massive intrusion.
2) It's also a gateway to bunch of nonsense and false information all over the Internet. Half the stuff I see about this person under allegations, I just don't trust. Not to mention all of a sudden there are tens of impersonators.
3) There are many people with the same name who’s going to get a backlash FYI.
All this is happening too close to people openly talking about what AI researchers are being traded on every social media platform. Idk if any of these people ever wanted to be so famous.
Aurornis 1 day ago | parent
If this person had done a single violation I'd agree. He's a serial manipulator, though, and he's been scamming people throughout the startup community. Once your behavior starts becoming a problem for a community, you shouldn't expect that community to also protect your identity.
The person was targeting a startup community (YC) and had learned how to game their system. The person posting the info didn't even post it immediately. They posted it a year later after hearing multiple stories of the person continuing to do it.
> 3) There are many people with the same name who’s going to get a backlash FYI.
There's a photo of him right in the thread specifically so people can determine if they're talking about the same person. He was also highlighted on a Meta open source developer blog a few years ago.
We all know people can have similar names.
data_yum_yum 1 day ago | parent
I’m not even sure if this guy is real or a made up story to poke fun at YC community.
Either way, I’m not losing sleep over it.
Just letting all of you know that someone’s always watching
eviks 2 days ago | parent
ReD_CoDE 2 days ago | parent
If you write something for one startup, you can use it in other startups too
So, some people like him fit easily for them all
dalemhurley 2 days ago | parent
dalemhurley 2 days ago | parent
Just imagine being one of the people who legit joins a startup, is passionate, working long hours, earning your vest, to have your coworker pretending to be working.
KeplerBoy 2 days ago | parent
tuckerpo 1 day ago | parent
Most corporations don't need nearly as many employees as they actually have, so if you can deliver exceptional results in 20 hours, why not dedicate the remaining 20 hours to another corp, and double your comp? Everyone wins.
HackerNews dudes claiming they do a true minimum 40 hours per week, every week, forever, of heads-down hard-work are deluding themselves. I really don't understand the overemployment hatred this forum has. There are plenty of folks who really do solid work at 2+ jobs, not half-assing and politicking.
Disclaimer: I am not OE.
Finnucane 1 day ago | parent
skeeter2020 1 day ago | parent
rpcorb 22 hours ago | parent
kjkjadksj 21 hours ago | parent
Teever 20 hours ago | parent
Wage theft vastly outstrips other forms of theft[0] and it's considered a complete non priority by law enforcement, politicians, and the media.
These kinds of things just aren't a priority for one reason for another. Let's brainstorm some solutions to wage theft and overemployment.
I suggest a synergistic approach -- fix wage theft and it'll have a knock-on effective with things like overemployment or people pretending to work a single job.
What do you think?
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wage_theft#/media/File:Wage_th...
gk1 2 days ago | parent
swah 1 day ago | parent
dakiol 1 day ago | parent
Tired of considering this “normal” and nobody talking about it. But when one simple engineer does it, well, it’s unethical, it’s wrong, yada yada.
rpcorb 22 hours ago | parent
kjkjadksj 21 hours ago | parent
timeon 1 day ago | parent
cardanome 17 hours ago | parent
If you really can work multiple jobs, just go freelance. Offer some consulting or whatever. You will earn more and have less stress than juggling multiple jobs.
chanux 2 hours ago | parent
I don't think this is uncommon.
the2ndfloorguy 2 days ago | parent
leovander 1 day ago | parent
jsbg 1 day ago | parent
Aurornis 1 day ago | parent
oldgradstudent 1 day ago | parent
FireBeyond 1 day ago | parent
Given that there's no oversight of the verification process, that can slide, too.
Nextgrid 1 day ago | parent
anshumankmr 1 day ago | parent
mathverse 1 day ago | parent
That's bonkers.
Nextgrid 1 day ago | parent
saejox 1 day ago | parent
Zealotux 1 day ago | parent
meander_water 1 day ago | parent
nottorp 1 day ago | parent
ayewo 1 day ago | parent
Office politics comes after you land a job so it doesn’t explain why he was so successful at getting multiple offers.
I’ve seen claims on Twitter that he used multiple tactics:
1. Good ol’ cold emails;
2.Using a recruiter for warm intros
3. Applying like everyone else but with a resume that is full of fabrications.
A common thread in many of his victim companies: he targeted mostly (YC) startups eager to hire (AI) engineers quickly so they can scale.
nottorp 1 day ago | parent
You think? I'm extending the term to actually getting a job in "traditional" organizations. You already have to optimize for keywords etc, don't you? It's not human interaction but a "process".
> he targeted mostly (YC) startups eager to hire (AI) engineers quickly so they can scale.
But they got an "AI" engineer didn't they? Or no one in management could define what an "AI" engineer is?
Tbh I'd give the guy a high paying job, but in marketing.
sfn42 1 day ago | parent
Some people do well working with obscure stuff like cobol and Delphi etc, but I wouldn't really recommend that unless it kind of just falls in your lap somehow.
Web development is pretty big, if you can work full stack even better. At least that's what I do, and I don't have any trouble getting jobs.
If you struggle with simple interview questions, work on fundamentals. All my technical interviews have been quite easy but the interviewers have been very impressed. This tells me most devs have poor understanding of programming fundamentals. Being able to do well at interviews is not that hard and it opens a lot of doors. Things like advent of code, codewars etc are good practice. Maybe dust off your old DS&A book and go through it again. A good DSA understanding will help you in your daily work as well, it's not just about interviews. You're not supposed to memorize algorithms, you're supposed to understand them, understand what makes some algorithms faster than others, understand how to use different data structures to improve your algorithms. Understand how to judge the performance of an algorithm just by reading it (big O and such). It's extremely useful and important, I use this knowledge on a daily basis and it helps me do well in interviews.
Also be good with databases. The database is the core of an application, it can and should do most of the heavy lifting. An API is basically just an adapter between a frontend and a db.
oh_fiddlesticks 1 day ago | parent
Why is it the social expectation that an IC must devote 100% of their time and energy to the operations of a single company, when their senior leadership often manages their time between the affairs of many companies in their purview?
mytailorisrich 1 day ago | parent
anonzzzies 1 day ago | parent
mytailorisrich 1 day ago | parent
The comment I was replying to does not make sense.
closewith 1 day ago | parent
nottorp 1 day ago | parent
Probably because said leadership would then be unable to keep their employees in meetings since they're supposed to do some actual work once in a while.
aleph_minus_one 1 day ago | parent
It is obviously easier to manage a small group of people who work full-time than a larger group of people who work part-time. So, if there does not exist a strong wish for part-time positions from the employees, few will be created.
Also, a lot of employees are there "for the money". So getting paid much worse for a part-time position is considered to be the worse deal by many employees.
Lyngbakr 1 day ago | parent
ozim 1 day ago | parent
nottorp 1 day ago | parent
ozim 1 day ago | parent
nottorp 1 day ago | parent
Of course, that only goes for IT if done remotely.
That's no reason to throw seasonal warehouse jobs at me as a counterexample.
skeeter2020 23 hours ago | parent
account42 1 day ago | parent
asdf6969 19 hours ago | parent
matwood 1 day ago | parent
The second part of this is disclosure, which was not done in this case.
killingtime74 1 day ago | parent
skeeter2020 1 day ago | parent
We can debate if the executive timeline is too short and that's what destroys companies, but I don't see how this is the same as an over-employed engineer who's spread too thin.
kevmo314 22 hours ago | parent
eviks 1 day ago | parent
killingtime74 1 day ago | parent
Barrin92 1 day ago | parent
That this involved lying to your employers. There is no social expectation that you only work one job, plenty of people work multiple jobs, but there is a social expectation that you do what you said you'd do, and it turns out you have a bit of a mathematical problem if you try to work 4 eight hour jobs in a 24 hour day.
Which is, as per the article, how he was caught. Turns out if you call in sick at one place and then push code to github for your other jobs most employers aren't paying you for that.
tkiolp4 1 day ago | parent
It’s silly and servant-like to think you are in an equal-to-equal position when dealing with a company and that you cannot dedicate your time to other endeavors just because they wrote that in a paper. If it turns out that they don’t like how you perform while doing multiple jobs, they will fire you, just like they will fire you even if you work just for them.
Barrin92 1 day ago | parent
asdf6969 18 hours ago | parent
Just because the employer pays me and I signed a contract doesn’t mean I can’t complain or push back. Do you think I should also dance like a Walmart employee in the morning if my employer tells me to? The contract I signed says yes but in reality it doesn’t matter
freefaler 1 day ago | parent
If one of the parties is in breach of that contract it's normal it to be dissolved. If you don't want to work, you don't need to sign that contract.
The really moral part of free market economy is that both parties are voluntary entering a contract. You as a person sell your skilled time, the company buys your skilled time. If you have super unique skills, like Andrej Karpathy you sell something on the market that is very valuable and you have the upper hand. If you know "Microsoft Excel" I'd bet there are many people (or AI agents) that will do the same and what you're selling can be bought in many places (and time zones).
Basic microeconomics... In a free market you need to do something for the others to have something for you. And if it's not useful, they won't pay you for that.
asdf6969 18 hours ago | parent
ozim 1 day ago | parent
It is kind of tiring for me to read people equating "Elon Musk" with "all those rich guys being CEOs".
When you really are a business owner OFTEN you have to devote 120% of your time and energy for running the company and single one.
People you see on TV flying private jets to expensive holiday destinations are not your average business owners. Elon and the likes are the exception not the norm.
rsynnott 1 day ago | parent
This is extremely rare; generally a CxO is a full-time job. Elon Musk is a notable exception, and, ah, it doesn't seem to be going _great_. Being a _board_ member isn't usually a significant time commitment.
confidantlake 21 hours ago | parent
altairprime 1 day ago | parent
liotier 1 day ago | parent
Lol - you don't have enough hobbies.
freefaler 1 day ago | parent
The math doesn't work long term. It may be kept for 1-2 months even when a person is 21 yrs old, but I doubt it it can be sustained more than that.
nottorp 1 day ago | parent
Did any of those simultaneous jobs even have someone who could evaluate their technical employees based on what they do and not signaling?
What I don't understand is why he updated his public profiles with all those simultaneous jobs..
VoidWhisperer 1 day ago | parent
iamwil 1 day ago | parent
voidUpdate 1 day ago | parent
Doesn't sound like "extremely dire financial circumstances" to me...
cardanome 1 day ago | parent
baobabKoodaa 1 day ago | parent
v5v3 1 day ago | parent
Tade0 1 day ago | parent
This looks like some sort of money sink he's ashamed to admit having. Might be gambling, might be porn. Whatever it is, it's not something he'll garner any compassion for.
v5v3 15 hours ago | parent
As per his cold emails and interview patter, it is my opinion that he will have considered defence and mitigations arguments to present in the interview.
voidUpdate 1 day ago | parent
cardanome 1 day ago | parent
Many people don't understand how serious gambling addictions is. It destroys families. I can be as bad as any drug related addiction if not worse.
Though that was just one guess. There are many money sinks. Porn, gacha games and so on.
FireBeyond 1 day ago | parent
He withdrew $1,000 from the ATM from his home back in Asia. Was duly given the cash. He noticed though, that looking at online banking, his balance hadn't changed. Odd, but maybe it was a vagary of international transactions (and again, 20+ years ago).
Nope. So he took out another $1,000. And another. Every time, got the money, no transaction posted.
Not just one ATM, any.
Over the course of 2 years when it all came out, he had gotten $2M+ from this.
Know how he got caught? He took some of that money gambling. And sat at a table all night, constantly replenishing his stash. That tipped off the casino that something was odd, because they had loaded the ATM with $250K, which usually lasted ~48h, but he emptied out in a few. "Didn't we fill this this afternoon?".
Once they got the financial institutions it was also fairly quickly revealed.
And in court, the local banks admitted that there had been nothing flagged in their system, and presumably it would have kept working until (at least) his card expired.
There you have a literal money printing machine, and "No, let's see what I can win gambling". I suppose here's other factors like "Maybe it's easier to launder a big winning" but nonetheless, it actually appeared more that he was just addicted to gambling.
Nextgrid 23 hours ago | parent
Presumably he expected the jig to go up eventually and be asked to return the money; if his gambling was successful he could've returned the money and avoid any trouble, essentially having made his winnings on credit.
dev_l1x_be 1 day ago | parent
aleph_minus_one 1 day ago | parent
He is the kind of person that companies actually want. (Otherwise these companies would have set up a different interviewing process (i.e. different incentives)).
:-)
andai 1 day ago | parent
twright 18 hours ago | parent
piker 1 day ago | parent
Try getting a code signing certificate, opening a bank account for a new business or listing an app on the App Store. You'll quickly see the effects of this kind of behavior.
This guy should be absolutely ostracized.
[Edit: not to mention the countless brilliant Indian software devs for whom he just directly put Silicon Valley out of reach.]
tkiolp4 1 day ago | parent
imron 1 day ago | parent
v5v3 1 day ago | parent
But it's funny. And people who make you laugh, even if naughty, get a pass.
account42 1 day ago | parent
tkiolp4 1 day ago | parent
At least in western europe, it’s very hard to land a 130K job, but two 65K jobs? Rather fine.
Lyngbakr 1 day ago | parent
tkiolp4 1 day ago | parent
distances 1 day ago | parent
Also don't most work contracts expressly prohibit taking a second job, with the reasoning that the company expects employees to rest so they stay productive in the main job?
It's hard to get a 130K job in EU but it's easy to reach and exceed that as an independent contractor, so that's an avenue you could try out.
cardanome 1 day ago | parent
So it is absolutely impossible for someone here to have two full time jobs without committing working time fraud.
But even if you could, it would make literally no sense two have jobs as you earn vastly more with freelancing anyway. You would scam yourself.
The most optimal move is to have one regular job so you get health care and social security and do freelancing on the side. If you work contract allows that, of course.
oc1 22 hours ago | parent
Teever 21 hours ago | parent
That's... peculiar.
shankr 20 hours ago | parent
cardanome 19 hours ago | parent
Also you don't really need to track your hours when freelancing other than maybe for billing purposes so you really don't need to worry about hours anyway. Generally you are considered part-time self-employed when doing less than 18 hours per week.
Earning a bit on the side is really not an issue in Germany. In fact the combination of having a part time employed job and then doing freelancing is very popular.
What doesn't work is being full time employed at two companies but that would make no sense even if you could as you would earn much less and pay insane taxes.
shankr 3 hours ago | parent
Having the right and your employer agreeing to it isn't the same. Do you want people to go to the court if the employer denies it with the risk of losing the job?
cardanome 20 hours ago | parent
What is an issue is working employed for two jobs and going over the 48 hour limits.
Working that much is very unhealthy so the state needs to protect people from being exploited. People should be able to live from working full time. Having to work multiple jobs and to destroy your own health is morally abhorrent.
Under German law being employed by a company and being self-employed are legally very distinct things. If you are employed you get protection from being fired, you have to have health care, pay into the retirement fond and so on.
If you are self-employed you are on your own. You can decide if you use public or private health care, you need to figure out how to save up for retirement yourself and so own. You get more freedom but less protection. That is because the law realizes that working people need protection from exploitation but also wants to give freedom to those that want to try their own business.
Teever 19 hours ago | parent
I get that the state needs to protect people from being exploited but I'm not sure this is the right way to go about it.
It seems to me that it would be better if the state had policies in place to ensure that one full-time job (or less even) provided sufficient income to enable a person to live self-sufficiently and raise a family.
Working a full-time job and raising a family is often a more stressful thing than a single person working a job that requires over-time. I don't see why the state should regulate how someone without kids spends their free time if that person wants to work.
Some people are just naturally inclined to be active, whether it's some combination of work, family, volunteering, and sports activities while others are not. I have a friend who is constantly working and constantly going to concerts and playing on several sports teams. His life seems stressful to me and far beyond how I want to spend my life but he enjoys it.
The state shouldn't restrict people from choosing how to spend their time, but instead should strive to create a society where people aren't forced to spend too much of their time working to meet their basic needs, with the ultimate goal of gradually reducing the time needed to do so over time.
cardanome 17 hours ago | parent
So single people that can work 60 hours a day would get all the careers options while the person raising children is left in the dust? Does not sound fair.
> Some people are just naturally inclined to be active, whether it's some combination of work, family, volunteering, and sports activities while others are not.
That sounds like a healthy mix of activities. On the other hand working 60 hours a week is not.
> The state shouldn't restrict people from choosing how to spend their time,
It does not. You can create your own business and work yourself to death if you wish to. Again, the protection is for those that are employed by others.
Or in other words: You are allowed to hurt your own health as an entrepreneur but you are not allowed to employ people in such a way that it excessively hurts their health, even if they "consent" to it. Thing is, they can't consent because there is a power imbalance. Even if you make laws that people working less hours should not be discriminated, you can't really stop it.
Not to mention someone who is a workaholic needs psychological help not the "freedom" to work more.
> but instead should strive to create a society where people aren't forced to spend too much of their time working to meet their basic needs, with the ultimate goal of gradually reducing the time needed to do so over time.
We already could already be working significantly less. I always like to link https://www.epi.org/productivity-pay-gap/
That is just not how capitalism works. Yes, you can fight for wage increases. You can fight for limits of working hours. But those gains will have to be paid in blood.
You idea would only work under socialism which had the Subbotnik which was volunteer unpaid labor on the weekends for the betterment of society.
Teever 17 hours ago | parent
Raising kids is but one kind of life stressor and it's not the state’s job to "equalize" life paths by punishing those who don’t have children or want to pursue different goals. Instead, the state should ensure a strong safety net so people are free to find their own balance.
Some pursuits genuinely take a monk-like dedication to see breakthroughs and we shouldn't hobble ambitious people who want to undertake them in the interest of fairness. You're describing a world where someone can't become a viruouso cellist, pioneer a life saving neurosurgery technique or revolutionize computer architecture because someone else decides to have kids. That doesn't sit right with me -- it's a little too Harrison Bergeron.
People might want to throw themselves into intense work for a decade before changing direction and focusing on raising a family or giving back to their community. Or maybe they want to do that the other way, start a family first and then once their kids are adults they want to pursue dreams that they spent decades dreaming of. Flexibility and dynamism in life roles is part of a healthy society.
The role of the state should be to ensure that no one has to 60 hours a week to survive and to ensure that everyone has real opportunities to live their best life that they choose -- not to make that choice for them.
cardanome 14 hours ago | parent
No one is forbidden to work more. You seem to miss that those laws apply to wage labor. You keep bringing up all kinds of work that have nothing to do with this.
> You're describing a world
I am describing the status quo in Germany and many other developed countries. The US are the outlier.
> someone can't become a viruouso cellist
No one is telling you how much or little you are allowed to practice an instrument. You can practice 24/7 in as far as the German state is allowed. Not to mention musicians that are self-employed anyway.
Same with the other points. You can dedicate all you waking time into practicing to solve leet code questions. You can focus everything on your research.
You can work on any hobby you have as much as little as you want. You do do as much research as you want. You can work on your own business as much as you want.
The ONLY, the ONLY thing you can't do is employ someone to work more than 48 hours per week. And reverse be employed on a job that requires you to work for more than 48 hours.
I think that is pretty reasonable.
> it's not the state’s job to "equalize" life paths by punishing those who don’t have children or want to pursue different goals.
Children used to have the freedom to work themselves to early death in mines and factories. It got so bad that it threatened the very foundation of society. So after that yeah people figured the state absolutely should protect children and families.
And again, this has nothing to do with wanting to equalize everyone. There are many areas where exceptional people can go.
Teever 13 hours ago | parent
I think that you're missing the broader point that I'm trying to make here which is this: Why should the state mandate a cap on voluntary employment, rather than focus on ensuring that no one needs to work that much to survive? A system that protects workers from coercion is great. But a system that also prohibits voluntary overcommitment, even when it's for personal growth, artistic mastery, or short-term goals, feels overly paternalistic and your example regarding child labour laws exemplifies that paternalism.
I feel like you're defending the system in Germany not because it's a better system as measured by some objective criteria but because it's the system that you identify with. Is there any sort of data to back up the assertion that a system where people are not allowed to pay other people for more than 48 hours of their time in a week a better system that leads to better outcomes than one where people are free to exchange their time in exchange for a wage with mandatory overtime?
guitarbill 8 hours ago | parent
This thread started by parent telling you how it is in Germany. Meanwhile, you have provided zero data or objective criteria yourself...
cardanome 7 hours ago | parent
Again, overtime is perfectly legal, we were just talking about the average working time per week.
> Why should the state mandate a cap on voluntary employment, rather than focus on ensuring that no one needs to work that much to survive?
Because the first one is the easiest way to ensure the later one. You are missing the power dynamic between employer and employee. That is they main point. It is just not possible for the extra work to be truly voluntarily.
It is the same principle why a boss having sex with their assistant is deeply unethical. Because the power dynamic. Even if we assistant is attracted to them. They know refusing could have consequences for their career.
Plus, that unicorn worker that wants to work more than 48 hours to make someone else rich and is otherwise a healthy, non workaholic individual, does not even exist. If someone is that driven they can just go freelancing and earn even more money.
You idea is solid in a vacuum but just doesn't work with the real power dynamics under capitalism.
> Is there any sort of data to back up the assertion that a system where people are not allowed to pay other people for more than 48 hours of their time in a week a better system that leads to better outcomes than one where people are free to exchange their time in exchange for a wage with mandatory overtime?
I mean the US has one of the worst work-life balances of any developed country, so yeah. Meanwhile Germany is pretty good in that regard. Again, most developed countries limit work time somehow.
Havoc 1 day ago | parent
Every single full time work contract that wasn't written by a complete moron spells out that full time is in fact full time.
The overemployed crowd just ignores it an hope they don't get sued / word spreads / prior gigs won't reference
Ylpertnodi 2 hours ago | parent
The eu contracts I've had (and seen) usually restrict you working for competitors. Never seen one that actually promotes 'rest', as a restriction on unpaid time.
Tade0 1 day ago | parent
I know several people who spent months working for two companies: one full time, the other part time. The most productive few would reach two full time positions and actually keep delivering for over a year.
The reason this happens at all is that sufficiently large organisations expect performance to be in a specific range - if it's too low you'll be fired, but going the extra mile will not yield benefits, as your compensation is decided by the assigned budget and promotions are rare.
Case in point: a few years ago my former co-worker was given "overtime" which was actually a hidden raise, as management really wanted to keep him, but couldn't officially increase his compensation. The organisation for which we worked eventually cracked down on such practices, so he left to work at a place which would compensate him this much and more without resorting to such tricks.
swader999 1 day ago | parent
ldjkfkdsjnv 22 hours ago | parent
lazyeye 19 hours ago | parent
dang 1 day ago | parent
https://techcrunch.com/2025/07/03/who-is-soham-parekh-the-se...
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/internet/man-goes-viral-working...
skeeter2020 1 day ago | parent
bmitc 23 hours ago | parent
jcadam 22 hours ago | parent
ldjkfkdsjnv 22 hours ago | parent
y-curious 20 hours ago | parent
TimorousBestie 19 hours ago | parent
johanyc 18 hours ago | parent
nyarlathotep_ 17 hours ago | parent
firstplacelast 17 hours ago | parent
The jobs aren't that hard and many people that fudged their experience are capable, so the liars that are hired perform adequately and hiring team sees no reason to adjust their strategy.
Eventually this gets out-of-hand as people learn to further exploit these practices.
tropicalfruit 19 hours ago | parent
instead of all the women chasing the same guy
its all the companies chasing the same dev
soham is a chad
has hiring turned into tinder?
ungreased0675 14 hours ago | parent
My advice to companies is to stop chasing unicorns and 10x engineers. Intentionally try to hire ordinary average engineers. Your company making a SaaS app doesn’t need talented programmers, it just needs ordinary ones.
Ego leads founders to chase top 1% talent in some cases. In other cases the product is terrible but they think hiring an amazing programmer will pull them out of the dive. It won’t. Just hire normal people and build normally.
jrflowers 13 hours ago | parent
This is what makes this story so funny. A lot of people are mad at the guy that found an exploit in the “we only hire shaman genius rockstars” system without a lick of ire directed at the “we only hire shaman genius rockstars” system.
Like if everybody’s profile on a dating app said “only interested in talking to Arnold Schwarzenegger”, then somebody’s eventually going to get catfished by a fake Kindergarten Cop. It’s kind of a “play stupid games, win stupid prizes” situation
austin-cheney 3 hours ago | parent
First of all we are developers only. Calling ourselves engineers is a sociopathic lie. Almost none of us are capable of doing anything that resembles engineering.
The problem with software is permissive tolerance of gross incompetence. I have been doing this for 20 years in the corporate world and can easily say 15% of the workforce knows what they are doing. The rest is reliant on other things to do it for them: open source applications, frameworks, toolkits, AI. The problem with industry wide incompetence is that solution delivery is slow, piecemeal, and extremely narrow in scope.
It really doesn’t take much to be a 10x developer. I have been a 10x developer multiple times. It typically means I learn to do the full 8 hours worth of work in less than 2 hours so that I can play games all day. The work delivered tends to be far more durable and execute substantially faster so nobody asks many questions. It’s not that I’m smart. It’s that my peers just do the same stupid shit over and over without asking questions because they are getting by with imposter syndrome.
Employers need to occasionally hire a 10x developer otherwise they are going to be hiring outside firms to fill that gap.
joshuanapoli 2 hours ago | parent
heldrida 3 hours ago | parent
Some claims he was brilliant, doing exactly what? Copying and pasting LLM output?
Did he participate in any hourly, daily technical conversations? Did he replied to others quick enough? Do these teams even know how to use slack, discord, etc? Are they having video meetings all the time and only person speaking like a podcast maybe?
lumost 1 hour ago | parent