10 points chatmasta 2 hours ago 17 comments
Is there some intuition we can apply to estimate how long it will take for supply to catchup to demand?
layer8 2 hours ago | parent
Another factor is that the viability of building new fabs is based on the assumption that there is no AI bubble that will burst. Opinions differ on how large that risk is.
proee 1 hour ago | parent
bigfatkitten 1 hour ago | parent
New production capacity takes years to bring online, and manufacturers are rightly cautious of the current demand bubble bursting, leaving them billions of dollars out of pocket.
quadramaDEV 1 hour ago | parent
2. Factory capacity Also yes. Chip fabs (factories) cost $10–20 billion and take 3–5 years to build. Even then, they run 24/7 and are already at max. You can't just "add another shift" – they're already running flat out.
3. The intuition for timing:
Chips: 3–5 years for new fabs (plus tool lead times)
Batteries: 2–4 years for new gigafactories
Mining: 5–10 years for new mines
So for things like EVs and GPUs, we're looking at 2–5 years before supply really catches up, assuming no new disruptions.
The good news? Once new capacity comes online, it tends to stay online – so the next shortage won't be as bad.
ternus 1 hour ago | parent
A RAM chip takes several months to make, starting from an empty silicon wafer. Each chip takes 8-10 weeks to go through the process of lithography, deposition, etching, cleaning, etc. It then must be tested, which can take another couple of weeks, then packaged, before it can be sold to manufacturers. Thus, even if fab capacity were available today (it isn't), you'd still see a multi-month lag before new supply hit the market.
(This is an extraordinarily sensitive process, and disrupting it can cause you to lose the entire batch. You might have heard of cases where "wafer starts" had to be discarded due to a tsunami or power disruption - this is why.)
maurycyz 1 hour ago | parent
The problem is actually making chips. The machines use to make modern integrated circuits are some of the most precise equipment in the world, manufacturing structures just tens of atoms across.
Getting more factories online might take close to a decade, and that's if anyone wants to pay: The current demand showed up basically overnight as some of the companies (running of investor money with no way to make profit) started a bidding war. Betting billions of dollars on them still being around in 5-10 years is just not a wise decision.
mrandish 22 minutes ago | parent
Historically dynamic RAM has gone through several boom/bust cycles, oscillating between manufacturers struggling to break-even and cutting production and then a few years later not being able to make enough chips. I remember the late 80s being another time where companies were delaying new product launches because they couldn't get DRAM.
WheelsAtLarge 55 minutes ago | parent
rkagerer 16 minutes ago | parent
terrycody 38 minutes ago | parent
manofmanysmiles 30 minutes ago | parent
Price collusion, and dumping (flooding market with low prices) if any real competitor shows up.
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
cocodill 29 minutes ago | parent
loose-cannon 17 minutes ago | parent
raw_anon_1111 6 minutes ago | parent
taki4416 3 minutes ago | parent
In fact, memory prices often change when a new factory is built. Manufacturers usually buy memory when prices are low, so we don’t really notice these changes when we buy products.
I work in the semiconductor industry, I recently asked the same question to some experts around me. They told me there is a lesson from the early days of personal computers. Improvements in operating systems reduced the amount of RAM needed, which caused serious problems for the memory industry.