15 points modzu 4 hours ago 7 comments

I submit an extension (an adblocker) to Google Chrome's web store.

Google keeps rejecting it for dubious reasons. The first rejection was claim it was "spam". When I appealed, the review came back that it contained "additional functionality" because it uses "modifies network traffic". Well of course it does! When I asked the reviewer how I could achieve the stated functionality of blocking ads without the use of "declarativeNetRequest" I simply received the same canned response.

I submit a totally new update that simplified the code and included comments, and references to other open source projecs that use the exact same mechanisms. Again it was rejected. On this appeal I asked if it could be escalated to a senior reviewer who could possibly reply with more context. Same canned response and rejection.

I can't help but think Google has some internal policy to give adblockers a runaround. It is obvious to me the stated rejections are not valid (Note that I'm also not new to this - I have several extensions that have been published for years with thousands of users) but have never encountered such gate-keeping before.

It's a sad state of affairs even if not totally unpredictable. To be honest I'm surprised Google hasn't made it an official policy to prohibit adblockers. But they haven't - obviously there are other adblockers published to the store, and that's what makes this so frustrating.

Anyway, fellow developers. Anyone run into a similar situation? And how did you resolve it? Thanks!

Rygian 1 hour ago | parent

"Excuse me sir, would you mind carrying this extension that goes against your core business of selling ads?"

Publish it as a Firefox add-on instead.

xingped 1 hour ago | parent

Yeah, this exactly. Google goes out of their way to be as unfriendly to adblockers as possible in Chrome. I don't know why anyone is still even using Chrome or why you would want to support them (by value-adding to their browser) with your efforts.

stronglikedan 48 minutes ago | parent

because it's still the fastest browser with the most intuitive UI, which is all the vast majority of people care about

ahriad 34 minutes ago | parent

Edge is better, with only downside is that MS keep pushing Bing on its users.

noncoml 26 minutes ago | parent

> all the vast majority of people care about

apparently, as demonstrated by this post, they care about ad-blockers too..

Boxxed 1 hour ago | parent

> I can't help but think Google has some internal policy to give adblockers a runaround.

Ding ding ding. Stop using chrome!

sitzkrieg 44 minutes ago | parent

google is an ad company. mow different lawns