YHK - yet another hacker news clone

17 points sukit 15 hours ago 29 comments

I’ve been following MCP since it first came out. It got a lot of attention early on, but I haven’t come across many people using it in production. I may simply have missed them.

If you’re using MCP in production, what are you using it for? What advantages have you found over a normal API or direct tool integration or just CLI?

igor_nast 14 hours ago | parent

We have it, a fresh tool that landed recently in prod. Makes it easier to communicate with the app resources. And it's a standardised way for agents to talk to a remote resource, easier for them to understand what is available and how to use it.

Read more about mcp tools/resources/prompts.

latchkey 1 hour ago | parent

I don't understand the need to make things easier for a robot. Point them at an API and they can figure it out. Can you explain in more detail what is easier?

DANmode 1 hour ago | parent

MCP apparently reduces probabilistic failures - aka the common fatal flaw of all of these robots (hallucinations, missing stuff in the API doc, etc).

This makes it a little more interesting to me, knowing those results.

It definitely underlines what we already know about the specific weaknesses of LLMs replies/results.

latchkey 1 hour ago | parent

I think that was a problem 6 months ago, but GPT 5.6 Sol on xhigh doesn't have those sorts of issues. I don't think it'll last. Things are moving fast.

DANmode 50 minutes ago | parent

I’d be willing to believe that!

Corporate still runs lots of bullshit for compliance, though.

latchkey 44 minutes ago | parent

what happens when openai offers compliance as a service?

bigstrat2003 22 minutes ago | parent

People say that with every single model release, and every single time they're wrong. I bet you anything that it's no different this time than the last dozen times.

latchkey 14 minutes ago | parent

i'm burning 500m tokens a day "writing code" for 83 days straight. one of those projects i'm building integrates netbox, stripe, quickbooks, mercury and deel all together via api. i wrote zero lines of code and read zero api docs. it does exactly what i want and gives me a 360 degree view of every aspect of my multi million dollar arr biz.

how about you?

muzani 13 hours ago | parent

I used one for an AI tool that allows people to report bugs/feature request directly.

It searches to make sure it isn't a duplicate, writes up the ticket, then submits it.

Because it's a production tool, we want the cheapest possible one without it being too inaccurate. If you used a API etc, you'd end up building what's effectively a MCP-like adapter on top of it anyway so it could communicate in natural language instead of dealing with JSON and such.

Linear's MCP is also very clean and well designed, probably one of their core advantages over, say, Jira. I wouldn't know what the API looks like because the MCP works great.

InfiniteLoup 7 hours ago | parent

>Linear's MCP is also very clean and well designed, probably one of their core advantages over, say, Jira.

I was under the impression that Linear's MCP server code isn't public. How do you know that it's well-designed beyond following spec[1][2]?

[1] https://linear.app/docs/mcp [2] https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/2026-07-28

tbrntbqm 6 hours ago | parent

That's what we used in our product - a bug report tool that uses Linear MCP to create a task. Works great.

jcheng 4 minutes ago | parent

They probably mean the tool APIs that the MCP server exposes are well designed. Definitely makes a big difference.

mrubon 4 hours ago | parent

I find clis or calling apis directly to be waaay cheaper and faster. The only mcp i use at this point is the jira mcp only because i set it up a while ago and it's been there for a long time now

altbdoor 1 hour ago | parent

Jira/Atlassian APIs are so convoluted anyways, I'd rather use the MCP

sonofaragorn 1 hour ago | parent

We used to use the jira mcp, then a jira skill, and now simply use the jira acli. Much cheaper and works fine

ntlm1686 1 hour ago | parent

many things once needed a MCP server now could be easily done via using CLI by agent

royal__ 1 hour ago | parent

This is the answer.

sonofaragorn 1 hour ago | parent

yes! I think it's yet another fad that is slowyly dying. I wish my company hadn't spent a whole team working for like 6 months creating an MCP server that no one will ever really use at scale

boltguo 1 hour ago | parent

I built a small MCP service tool to my own learning; it retrieves study materials and course content, enabling me to learn through voice-based interactive conversations with ChatGPT. logs my learning data, which I can then retrieve and analyze to assess my overall progress.

caudena 1 hour ago | parent

Caudena released some of its enterprise capabilities within MCP last year, and made them available to the consumer market this year at https://mcp.caudexcatena.com/.

We have received very good feedback from clients across the enterprise and consumer segments, they really like it.

JohnHaugeland 1 hour ago | parent

i’m a day or two from releasing my programming language’s new mcp

reilly3000 1 hour ago | parent

MCP is still the main way I use Cursor with enterprise systems like Glean, Jira, and Port. Other than that, everything, especially you GitHub, is moved to CLIs (+skills as needed)

earthdeity 1 hour ago | parent

I hooked up claude code to Jira and Figma. This is more a condemnation of Jira than anything, but being able to interact with it in natural language in the terminal is a huge relief. Sadly, it's still limited in some ways. If it's available, it makes things a tiny bit easier than interfacing directly via api, so it's a nice to have.

agentdev001 46 minutes ago | parent

> "it makes things a tiny bit easier than interfacing directly via api"

By what metric? I would expect that a thin API client (with readable code) is generally going to out-perform a tool-surface which you don't have the ability to manage/edit.

Our_Benefactors 30 minutes ago | parent

If you don’t use the MCP Claude will default to taking screenshots of figma designs.

jadar 8 minutes ago | parent

I did this as well. I found that it was really inefficient because if I was doing anything with a significant amount of text, it has to shuttle all of that through the model to the MCP invocation. It was way better to work with temporary files and pipe them around CLI tools once you’re happy with the contents. E.g. developing a user story and creating the Jira issue.

mootothemax 48 minutes ago | parent

I recently created a planning applications scraper for every council/local planning authority in the UK, very much with Claude's help. As you can no doubt imagine, it's the type of task where the mechanics are far less important than everything surrounding them.

Getting things like this to work well, for me, often boils down to finding out the things I don't know that I don't know in as little time as possible. I worked with Claude to create a basic debugging front-end as part of that - for my own use, inspecting the data, looking for patterns - when, largely on a whim, I asked Claude to create an MCP interface on top: last run status, what's looking good, whats not, where are the coverage gaps in the individual data points.

And I added the MVP to Claude and would check in regularly to ask how things were going.

And then - I'd ask for some nuance about why something doesn't look quite right. Or what happened to councils in general last night? And - out of nowhere, not being prompted or asked - Claude would query the MCP alongside looking at the code. Immediate production-grade insight while I'm debugging from the comfort of my chair.

And I thought "Oh."

And "this is really quite good," because the key detail is, I think, if an MCP is good and works well, and relevant to what you're doing every day at that point in time, it's yet another addition to your toolbox.

And that got me thinking about how I can do the same for my 9-5 users.

Motheki 24 minutes ago | parent

I use fff [1] For the performance improvements when reading files. I prefer in most scenarios to use skills.

(1) https://github.com/dmtrKovalenko/fff

ma2kx 7 minutes ago | parent

In general the advantage of MCP would be the possibility for a fine grained control over the tools the agent is allowed to use. But unfortunately there is a myriad of nightmarish awful mcp servers around which are worse than direct API access or even a cli integration.

I wont advertise any commercial mcp I use but to give an example for a well designed and useful mcp server I could name the nixos mcp. Its useful because it bundles all the nix resources to one endpoint which is more efficient than web search and gives you better control over the sources.

https://github.com/utensils/mcp-nixos

Another one would be this filesystem mcp which is in my opinion to prefer over direct cli access. Of course this depends also on your general sandbox strategy but if you just use a generic docker image there are still many potentially dangerous binaries available and such an mcp can restrict the models capabilities.

https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/servers/tree/main/sr...

And of course there are many service provider offering their mcp with its own llm / agent behind e.g. most web search provider. In this case you most likely already use an mcp without noticing it.